Johnny5 Posted March 10, 2005 Posted March 10, 2005 I have a question about something i read here. Why did they choose not to define vector division exactly? They said something about non-uniqueness, and I don't follow. To help me refresh my memory, suppose that we have two lines in an xy plane. For the sake of reality, let the plane be a real plane in real space. An equation for any line in the plane will have the following form: Ax+By+C=0 Suppose we have two lines. [math] A_1 x + B_1 y + C_1 = 0 [/math] [math] A_2 x + B_2 y + C_2 = 0 [/math] We can rewrite the equations as follows: [math] A_1 x + B_1 y = - C_1 [/math] [math] A_2 x + B_2 y = - C_2 [/math] We can rewrite this in matrix form now. [math] A \mathbf{v} = \left[ \begin{array}{cc} A_1 \ B_1 \\ A_2 \ B_2 \\ \end{array} \right] \left[ \begin{array}{c} x \\ y \\ \end{array} \right] = \left[ \begin{array}{c} -C1 \\ -C2 \\ \end{array} \right] = B [/math] Where I am using notation found here. Now the same site says, "vector division is not defined becase there is no unique solution to the matrix equation y=Ax UNLESS x is parallel to Y." So in that matrix equation they are talking about, y is a column vector, and x is a column vector right?
matt grime Posted March 11, 2005 Posted March 11, 2005 What is division? it's the inverse operation to multiplication. so, what ways do you have of multiplying two vectors to give a vector?
Johnny5 Posted March 11, 2005 Author Posted March 11, 2005 What is division? it's the inverse operation to multiplication. so, what ways do you have of multiplying two vectors to give a vector? I only know of one mathematical process which operates on two vectors, and outputs a vector... the cross product. The dot product also operates on two vectors, but it outputs a scalar.
matt grime Posted March 12, 2005 Posted March 12, 2005 And if you take two non-zero vectors, u and v, then uxv may be zero. Thus you cannot formally invert multiplication for all vectors. (And this only works in R^3 anyway). The point is that there is almost always no useful way to define a multplication operation on vectors that is invertible (ie there will always be two non-zero vectors that mulitply to give the zero vector) . The notable exception is R^2 where we can define (a,b)*(c,d)=(ac-bd,bc+ad), and we get a space that is isomorphic to the complex numbers.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now