Hypothesis on Good and Evil and it's .....

[Dr. Funkenstein]

Too be clear, my hypothesise does not contend with the philosophical nature of Good and Evil, in Form. My facts dictate that Good is an inherent trait of everything in exsistence, while Evil is a product of Man's own design, by means of his base senses out of porportion.

 

In war which could be called the ultimate evil, the good if totaly blameless in the inception of, must either submit to the particular gruesome which wars brings, or take part in the war, hoping for an different ending. In doing so must Good then become Evil or is there a balance which the Good can cling too in order not to become the opposite of the thing that it is. Which then in turn would make the participation in war of no avail to the good, since it seeks nothing in effect of the blameless cause.

 

If it does not participate, Evil will not relent, since it's cause is generally purposeful, and thus goodness becomes a mere stepping stone for the evil of no contention. So is Good then just aspiration, while Evil a mechanical contrivance of it's possesor. In the formlessness of the two?