cladking Posted February 8 Author Posted February 8 (edited) This is simply fascinating; https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/14/20/5231 The authors suggest that the function of the pyramid was related to hydraulics. All advancement in the study of the pyramids is now outside Egyptology which still won't release the infrared results from 2015. I have some question about the validity of all these results but I'm quite confident at least some of it is fully legitimate and accurate. I'm still digesting it. (b Interferometric fringes of Khnum-Khufu I seriously doubt we'll understand the pyramids until we give up the notion that its builders were superstitious. Edited February 8 by cladking 1
studiot Posted February 8 Posted February 8 Thank you for posting this update, +1 Just now, cladking said: This is simply fascinating; https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/14/20/5231 I note that right at the beginning the authors acknowledge difficulties with solid-penetrating radar and later introduce ulltrasonic tomography. I too have had better reliability and accuracy. looking into solids with ultrasonics than with radar
cladking Posted February 12 Author Posted February 12 On 2/8/2025 at 5:02 PM, studiot said: Thank you for posting this update, +1 I note that right at the beginning the authors acknowledge difficulties with solid-penetrating radar and later introduce ulltrasonic tomography. I too have had better reliability and accuracy. looking into solids with ultrasonics than with radar I should understand this study and its results better than I do. I didn't realize when I posted it that it is essentially the same study done a couple years back that I didn't post here because I found the results to be suspicious, but more importantly, because the results neither support Egyptological theory nor mine. Indeed, the passages can be taken as internal ramps better supporting their concepts than mine. I no longer have access to the original so can't compare them but the only change may be that more math is shown. There will be more and more of this sort of testing and remote sensing with ever better equipment, analysis, and expertise whether Egyptology cooperates or not. There are more theoretical means of imaging these that haven't been invented and developed yet. I have little doubt the answers will be forthcoming within a few years.
studiot Posted Saturday at 10:45 PM Posted Saturday at 10:45 PM Tomography is a highly mathematical subject that takes a great deal of postgraduate level understanding.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now