andrewcellini Posted October 30, 2014 Posted October 30, 2014 (edited) Are there any theories which directly relate these two, that this feature of neurons could be necessary for consciousness to emerge? I've read high conductance states are found in thalamocortical radiations and I vaguely remember thalamocortical radiations being implicated in consciousness in another theory (dynamic theory?). Edited October 30, 2014 by andrewcellini
andrewcellini Posted October 31, 2014 Author Posted October 31, 2014 (edited) http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/High-conductance_state#Models_of_high-conductance_states trying to find a paper on dynamic core hypothesis (not a theory my mistake) i can link for you to read in full and having a bit of trouble. one of the authors is giulio tononi. edit: found one http://wiki.dxarts.washington.edu/sandbox/groups/general/wiki/6746a/attachments/2b0a6/Tononi-Edelman%20Science-1998-.pdf?sessionID=a4ebd3f43afa7fffb5c21749aed42be63973d1df Edited October 31, 2014 by andrewcellini
Genecks Posted October 31, 2014 Posted October 31, 2014 (edited) I'm sorry. I'm too busy at the moment to help you with this. There should still be at least one or two other neuroscientists around here. Otherwise, there are biologists and people with some psychology and philosophy background. Edited October 31, 2014 by Genecks
John Cuthber Posted October 31, 2014 Posted October 31, 2014 If memory serves the most conductive nerves are theses http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squid_giant_axon and, with the best will in the world, I don't think that squid are noted for their intellect. (Though their octopus cousins are very bright)
andrewcellini Posted November 2, 2014 Author Posted November 2, 2014 is there any other advantage to high conductivity besides faster propagation of action potential (in this case faster response of siphon to flee)?
Genecks Posted January 23, 2015 Posted January 23, 2015 (edited) I think consciousness is still a phenomena that we've yet to understand, just as much as vision. Edited January 23, 2015 by Genecks
andrewcellini Posted January 28, 2015 Author Posted January 28, 2015 I think consciousness is still a phenomena that we've yet to understand, just as much as vision. what would good places to start learning about what we do know?
Xalatan Posted March 3, 2015 Posted March 3, 2015 Presumably by high conductance you are referring to the process of myelination, in which case yes you could argue compared to patients with MS for example, normal myelination improves cognition and perhaps consciousness. But my understanding of consciousness - defined as wakefulness, having a normal mental state, and ability to follow instructions, is more of a function of structural and functional integrity to certain sets of neurons in the brainstem - for example the reticular formation. If you were to reduce conductance of the reticular formation neurons you may reduce consciousness, but almost all pathologies to the brain stem would lead to the same outcome of loss of consciousness, it's not solely limited to a problem with neuronal conductance. I hope this helps!
andrewcellini Posted March 3, 2015 Author Posted March 3, 2015 Presumably by high conductance you are referring to the process of myelination in post 3 i have a link to an encyclopedia entry on what i am talking about.
Genecks Posted May 2, 2015 Posted May 2, 2015 (edited) I think there is a lot more to vision and consciousness than we understand. Philosophers of science are on the right track, but I sometimes wonder if the scientific method that we use is limited ("measurement problem" issue). However, there is still the whole mathematical basis of vision, such as related to Fourier transformations, which makes me a strong believer in the mathematical universe hypothesis. With that said, I think "consciousness" can be related to a mathematical construct. I covered something like this on philosophyforums.com before it was hacked and wiped. Edited May 2, 2015 by Genecks
StringJunky Posted May 2, 2015 Posted May 2, 2015 The problem with emergent effects, like consciousness, is there's no real way to deduce the fundamental components that comprise it. I think I saw somewhere that emergence is equivalent to 2+2=5.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now