shaks Posted November 28, 2014 Posted November 28, 2014 (edited) I have one project of developing setup to lift heavy water at some height. A setup that take less energy as compare to traditional water pumps. I was searching on net and I found giant "water wheels" of ancient times to lift water.Like this one http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norias_of_HamaIs this possible to rotate this with electric motor and make setup to lift water which is efficient than traditional water pumps?I was thinking that due to circular motion, inertia, momentum, centripetal force, etc might be this can be more efficient than traditional water pumps!. I thought it may require more power to move it from rest but once wheel gets momentum then it requires less power as compare to moving from rest. For example:Wheel diameter: 30 meterWater mass: 100,000 kgSpeed: 1 round in 10 minutesDriven by: electric motorI don't have any physics background so please excuse me if you feel this is stupid idea. Please give your opinion on this?Shaks Edited November 28, 2014 by shaks
John Cuthber Posted November 28, 2014 Posted November 28, 2014 At best, it might be marginally more efficient than a more conventional pump. My guess is that it would be less efficient.
Robittybob1 Posted November 28, 2014 Posted November 28, 2014 I have one project of developing setup to lift heavy water at some height. A setup that take less energy as compare to traditional water pumps. I was searching on net and I found giant "water wheels" of ancient times to lift water. Like this one http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norias_of_Hama Is this possible to rotate this with electric motor and make setup to lift water which is efficient than traditional water pumps? I was thinking that due to circular motion, inertia, momentum, centripetal force, etc might be this can be more efficient than traditional water pumps!. I thought it may require more power to move it from rest but once wheel gets momentum then it requires less power as compare to moving from rest. For example: Wheel diameter: 30 meter Water mass: 100,000 kg Speed: 1 round in 10 minutes Driven by: electric motor I don't have any physics background so please excuse me if you feel this is stupid idea. Please give your opinion on this? Shaks You're going to need a lot of gearing to get an electric motor reduced down to 1 rev /10 mins Do you want to lift 10 tons of water every revolution? It would have to be a very heavy wheel, so how many horse power will that take to move?
shaks Posted November 28, 2014 Author Posted November 28, 2014 (edited) You're going to need a lot of gearing to get an electric motor reduced down to 1 rev /10 mins Do you want to lift 10 tons of water every revolution? It would have to be a very heavy wheel, so how many horse power will that take to move? I am looking for same answer. Wheel diameter: 30 meter Water mass: 100,000 kg Speed: 1 round in 10 minutes Driven by: electric motor 100,000 kg water = 26,417 gallon per round (1 gallon = 3.78541 liter/kg) 26,417 gallon / 10 minutes = 2,641 gallon per minute (gpm) I found formula of calculating pump power according to gpm. Motor HP = (height in feet * gpm) / 3960 Motor HP = (98.42 x 2641) / 3960 = 65.64 HP = 48.95 KW So if traditional pumps are used to lift 2,641 gpm then estimated 48.95 KW motor is required. Any idea if same amount of water is lifted by water wheel then how much electricity will be required? I believe that moving wheel from rest to required speed will take same electricity but once wheel get momentum then it should take less electricity to keep that momentum/speed? Shaks Edited November 28, 2014 by shaks
swansont Posted November 28, 2014 Posted November 28, 2014 49 kW is the amount of power you need to raise the water to that height, at that rate. It does not take into account the efficiency of the system used to run it, i.e. it will not work with 49 kW (or less), but you don't know how much extra you will need. 1
Sensei Posted November 28, 2014 Posted November 28, 2014 (edited) 48.95 KW Typical house in EU has power provided U=230 V,I=18 A, P=U*I=230 V*18 A = 4140 W = 4 kW After exceeding Imax fuses are disconnecting.. Better check your maximums before proceeding (even if you're in factory). Edited November 28, 2014 by Sensei
Endy0816 Posted November 28, 2014 Posted November 28, 2014 On the similar sakia, but may help with the numbers: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNAAM711.pdf Still in use today. http://www.apachecorp.com/News/Articles/View_Article.aspx?Article.ItemID=2122 Everything suggests they are less efficient, but can make up for it in terms of maintenance costs depending on how rural the situation is.
John Cuthber Posted November 29, 2014 Posted November 29, 2014 These people told you it's 49KW https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/making-ancient-time-water-wheel-to-lift-water.784503/ So did these http://www.thescienceforum.com/physics/47711-possible-make-energy-efficient-ancient-time-water-wheel-lift-water.html And (roughly speaking) these http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=52915.msg444395#msg444395 so why are you asking again?
shaks Posted November 29, 2014 Author Posted November 29, 2014 so why are you asking again? Simple, because still I did not get answer. If you have reply here.
Robittybob1 Posted November 29, 2014 Posted November 29, 2014 (edited) Simple, because still I did not get answer. If you have reply here. There is no answer that can be calculated. You can work out how much energy is required to lift that amount of water that height and at least double it to overcome inefficiency due to friction and viscosity of the water. The whole wheel is going to weigh tonnes and what sort of bearings are you using, and then all the bearings and pulleys in the gear reduction drive. If it was the best way to go they would have kept using the technology. The pictures I saw used the water flowing past the wheel at the bottom to power it. In that situation it would be still one of the best. If the water being pumped is already stationary centrifugal pumps probably are the best technology. Edited November 29, 2014 by Robittybob1
shaks Posted November 29, 2014 Author Posted November 29, 2014 (edited) There is no answer that can be calculated. You can work out how much energy is required to lift that amount of water that height and at least double it to overcome inefficiency due to friction and viscosity of the water. Everyone says this but no one mention all steps how to make correct calculation? Can you tell me? I want to calculate water wheel on "circular motion" rules not "linear motion" rules. If you want to help, you can tell me from where to start and how to find required power to rotate? Shaks Edited November 29, 2014 by shaks
Robittybob1 Posted November 29, 2014 Posted November 29, 2014 Everyone says this but no one mention all steps how to make correct calculation? Can you tell me? I want to calculate water wheel on "circular motion" rules not "linear motion" rules. If you want to help, you can tell me from where to start and how to find required power to rotate? Shaks I don't think it will matter if it is on a circle or straight up against gravity, so just calculate how much energy it will take to raise that mass of water that height, and then power required depending on how fast you want to do it.
shaks Posted November 29, 2014 Author Posted November 29, 2014 On the similar sakia, but may help with the numbers: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNAAM711.pdf This is good info and I will try to explore it. The pictures I saw used the water flowing past the wheel at the bottom to power it. In that situation it would be still one of the best. I like this idea. The first priority is to "rotate water wheel" with "flowing water". Now the question is how much water required to rotate such wheel? I mean following: 1. How much water flow required 2. Above water flow can rotate how big wheel 3. How much water can be lifted in one round I think this is good idea, I created one diagram of my idea regarding flowing water. Will this work i.e. we can create slob to create pressure in water flow so wheel may be rotated but the question is how to measure force of flowing water? How to measure force of flowing water or kinetic energy or potential energy of flowing water? Any idea on this? so just calculate how much energy it will take to raise that mass of water that height, and then power required depending on how fast you want to do it. What are equations to calculate "energy" and "power" as you mentioned? Shaks
swansont Posted November 29, 2014 Posted November 29, 2014 Everyone says this but no one mention all steps how to make correct calculation? Can you tell me? I want to calculate water wheel on "circular motion" rules not "linear motion" rules. If you want to help, you can tell me from where to start and how to find required power to rotate? Potential energy is path independent — all that matters is the initial and final position, so it is not a matter of "circular motion" rules vs "linear motion" rules. You haven't given enough detail to do the correct calculation. You would need to know how much friction there is and what the efficiency of the motor is, for starters.
Robittybob1 Posted November 29, 2014 Posted November 29, 2014 This is good info and I will try to explore it. I like this idea. The first priority is to "rotate water wheel" with "flowing water". Now the question is how much water required to rotate such wheel? I mean following: 1. How much water flow required 2. Above water flow can rotate how big wheel 3. How much water can be lifted in one round I think this is good idea, I created one diagram of my idea regarding flowing water. Will this work i.e. we can create slob to create pressure in water flow so wheel may be rotated but the question is how to measure force of flowing water? How to measure force of flowing water or kinetic energy or potential energy of flowing water? Any idea on this? What are equations to calculate "energy" and "power" as you mentioned? Shaks The diagram looks silly, that 2nd cube of water - where does the height of this come from?
shaks Posted November 29, 2014 Author Posted November 29, 2014 (edited) The diagram looks silly, that 2nd cube of water - where does the height of this come from? Actually I create this diagram in hurry because I will be busy and can create proper diagram with amount of flow after few hours so I posted it so I can get some feedback while I am out. Ignore that I will create that again and make it equal to canal height. Make it wider so water stores there and then flow out with pressure. There is also idea to make canal a little narrow at end to create pressure. Hopefully you got the idea/concept, what do you say about this, will this work something. I mean create pressure with slob and some kind of physical building and canals and then water moves to next wheel. Shaks Edited November 29, 2014 by shaks
Robittybob1 Posted November 29, 2014 Posted November 29, 2014 (edited) Actually I create this diagram in hurry because I will be busy and can create proper diagram with amount of flow after few hours so I posted it so I can get some feedback while I am out. Ignore that I will create that again and make it equal to canal height. Make it wider so water stores there and then flow out with pressure. There is also idea to make canal a little narrow at end to create pressure. Hopefully you got the idea/concept, what do you say about this, will this work something. I mean create pressure with slob and some kind of physical building and canals and then water moves to next wheel. Shaks Don't bother, for unless you have ground that is continually falling away you are not getting any water to flow. You have to have a specific geological situation to work with and obviously the bottom of a water slide is ridiculous to start with. Unless you tell me that the water is wasted from the bottom of the water slide, you can't go and take 100 tonnes of water away every 10 minutes. Edited November 29, 2014 by Robittybob1
shaks Posted November 29, 2014 Author Posted November 29, 2014 Don't bother, for unless you have ground that is continually falling away you are not getting any water to flow. You have to have a specific geological situation to work with and obviously the bottom of a water slide is ridiculous to start with. Unless you tell me that the water is wasted from the bottom of the water slide, you can't go and take 100 tonnes of water away every 10 minutes. Water from all slides/rides is collected in a central pool from where we can take it anywhere. Its around 20,000 gpm (gallon per minute) coming in central pool. I did not mention to start from bottom of water slide. Any idea how to calculate force of flowing water i.e. we can make geological location according to requirement. You give you idea how it should be to achieve the goal? Shaks I found this http://www.nws.noaa.gov/os/water/tadd/images/WaterPhysics.pdfand reading, might be there is something related to my concern. Shaks
Robittybob1 Posted November 29, 2014 Posted November 29, 2014 (edited) Water from all slides/rides is collected in a central pool from where we can take it anywhere. Its around 20,000 gpm (gallon per minute) coming in central pool. I did not mention to start from bottom of water slide. Any idea how to calculate force of flowing water i.e. we can make geological location according to requirement. You give you idea how it should be to achieve the goal? Shaks I found this http://www.nws.noaa.gov/os/water/tadd/images/WaterPhysics.pdfand reading, might be there is something related to my concern. Shaks Don't they pump that water up to the top of the rides again? Look up turbines and pelton wheel. http://www.hidropower.si/en/products?gclid=CMvxzse-n8ICFRNvvAod0akA8w - there will be plenty of ideas. Edited November 29, 2014 by Robittybob1
shaks Posted November 29, 2014 Author Posted November 29, 2014 (edited) Don't they pump that water up to the top of the rides again? Look up turbines and pelton wheel. http://www.hidropower.si/en/products?gclid=CMvxzse-n8ICFRNvvAod0akA8w - there will be plenty of ideas. Wonderful, I started this thread for same purpose to develop such setup to lift water which take less running cost as compare to traditional pumps. Turbines and pelton wheels are irrelevant for current project. How do you connect these to lift water without using electricity? Shas Edited November 29, 2014 by shaks
Robittybob1 Posted November 29, 2014 Posted November 29, 2014 Wonderful, I started this thread for same purpose to develop such setup to lift water which take less running cost as compare to traditional pumps. Shas Could it be done through evaporation/condensation?
shaks Posted November 29, 2014 Author Posted November 29, 2014 Could it be done through evaporation/condensation? No, it can't be. Powering water wheel with flowing water is good idea, I want to work more on this. I mean want to find force of flowing water and then calculate at what speed water can rotate water wheel to lift water. Shaks
Robittybob1 Posted November 29, 2014 Posted November 29, 2014 No, it can't be. Powering water wheel with flowing water is good idea, I want to work more on this. I mean want to find force of flowing water and then calculate at what speed water can rotate water wheel to lift water. Shaks You'd be lucky if you would lift even a fraction of the water rushing past the wheel. say 5% would be a guess.
shaks Posted November 29, 2014 Author Posted November 29, 2014 You'd be lucky if you would lift even a fraction of the water rushing past the wheel. say 5% would be a guess. So, you can't help anymore regarding calculating force of flowing water. The purpose is for example lift as much water as it can be by installing like 10 wheels in a row. Same water is flowing and each wheel is lifting some water. Installation cost of these wheels is one time cost however pumping cost is daily running cost. So first attempt is to make such setup which can lift water by consuming less electricity (not free, I said less) as compare to traditional pumps. Even if 10 wheels can lift 30%-40% of total flowing water (like 20,000 gpm coming in main pool and then flowing out towards wheels) then its not bad deal. And rest can be lifted with some other mechanism or traditional pumps. In this case at least 30%-40% pumping cost will be saved for forever. Anybody help here? Shaks 5% would be a guess. If each wheel can lift 5% of water flowing under wheel, then its not bad deal. 10 wheels x 5% = 50% of total water coming out from main pool. Shaks
Robittybob1 Posted November 29, 2014 Posted November 29, 2014 (edited) So, you can't help anymore regarding calculating force of flowing water. The purpose is for example lift as much water as it can be by installing like 10 wheels in a row. Same water is flowing and each wheel is lifting some water. Installation cost of these wheels is one time cost however pumping cost is daily running cost. So first attempt is to make such setup which can lift water by consuming less electricity (not free, I said less) as compare to traditional pumps. Even if 10 wheels can lift 30%-40% of total flowing water (like 20,000 gpm coming in main pool and then flowing out towards wheels) then its not bad deal. And rest can be lifted with some other mechanism or traditional pumps. In this case at least 30%-40% pumping cost will be saved for forever. Anybody help here? Shaks In my opinion it won't work using wheels so I don't want to rack my brains. What is the water going to be used for? Edited November 29, 2014 by Robittybob1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now