omar salah Posted December 12, 2014 Share Posted December 12, 2014 (edited) What is NLP?[/font][/url] Neuro Linguistic Programming: Is the study of how people organize their thinking, feeling, language and behaviour to produce the results they really want? It's the science which explores the workings of the human mind; how we think, how we develop our desires, goals and fears and how we motivate ourselves, make connections and make sense of our experiences. Briefly it's the art of modelling of human excellence. Edited December 12, 2014 by swansont remove links Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
physica Posted December 12, 2014 Share Posted December 12, 2014 Considering that in your profile you consider yourself as a NLP practitioner I'm hedging that this is more of an advert as opposed to a scientific discussion. I've reported this for moderator review Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted December 12, 2014 Share Posted December 12, 2014 ! Moderator Note Links removed. From the rules: Advertising and spam is prohibited. We don't mind if you put a link to your noncommercial site (e.g. a blog) in your signature and/or profile, but don't go around making threads to advertise it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
physica Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 What is NLP?[/font][/url] Neuro Linguistic Programming: Is the study of how people organize their thinking, feeling, language and behaviour to produce the results they really want? It's the science which explores the workings of the human mind; how we think, how we develop our desires, goals and fears and how we motivate ourselves, make connections and make sense of our experiences. Briefly it's the art of modelling of human excellence.pillars of NLP 1.jpg This all seems a little vague. I can't see how you're going to make testable predictions of these things. It seems like a classic case of abusing the term science to make something seem more credible. A classic example of this was a book I came across called the science of Karma. Considering that we can't come up with an experiment to test the outcomes of Karma it isn't a science. The person who wrote the book clearly doesn't know what science is. The outcomes that you're talking about are vague and subjective I don't know how you could quantify them, let alone measure them and turn it into a science. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now