John Cuthber Posted January 29, 2015 Posted January 29, 2015 You are not participating is a discussion either.
StringJunky Posted January 29, 2015 Posted January 29, 2015 Consequently, a proclaimed prediction by BEAM has come true once again. Complete Gewaltlosigkeit – on hearing it first this idea sounds of peace, harmony and love. However, observed and considered more closely, that is to say, in the light of the truth, it is not assertive in the long run, because an absolute Gewaltlosigkeit in a one-sided form is not capable of surviving. In order to actually make life possible in the positive-equalisedness, the two poles, NEGATIVE and POSITIVE, must stand to each other in an equalised-harmonic power-relation, whereby a healthy balance of powers, that is to say, a viable harmony is created, which integrates into the unswerving principles of the laws of nature. As soon as the scales swing to one direction or the other in an excessive wise and the balance threatens to tip, the power-relation gets out of control in the positive or in the negative and leads to the destruction of the life forms, the peace, the freedom, the harmony, the love, and so forth. A random sample.
John Cuthber Posted January 29, 2015 Posted January 29, 2015 I didn't get that far- my internet security software blocked it. I wouldn't recommend that anyone ckicks on that link
StringJunky Posted January 29, 2015 Posted January 29, 2015 I didn't get that far- my internet security software blocked it. I wouldn't recommend that anyone ckicks on that link It's a hosting domain funded by ads so that's why your software blocked it. I'm covered for the risks but there's no need for anyone to click on it: that snippet says it all.
Strange Posted January 29, 2015 Posted January 29, 2015 A random sample. It certainly sounds like a sample from a random text generator.
swansont Posted January 29, 2015 Posted January 29, 2015 IM NOT SPAMMING url deleted ! Moderator Note Rule 2.7. Sections bolded for emphasis "Advertising and spam is prohibited. We don't mind if you put a link to your noncommercial site (e.g. a blog) in your signature and/or profile, but don't go around making threads to advertise it. Links, pictures and videos in posts should be relevant to the discussion, and members should be able to participate in the discussion without clicking any links or watching any videos. Videos and pictures should be accompanied by enough text to set the tone for the discussion, and should not be posted alone. Users advertising commercial sites will be banned." You are in violation of this rule. You have done this before (and with multiple) links, so yes, you are spamming. While I'm here, I will point out that in your other thread that was moved to the trash the links all used a shiortener, so one could not easily tell if they went legitimate sites. That's a bad practice to follow; there's no character limit in posting here. Use full URLs. Since there is no link now, there is nothing to discuss, so this is locked. If you can start a discussion that follows the rules (all of the rules, including the speculations guidelines, if appropriate) then you may re-introduce this topic.
Recommended Posts