pcalton Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 ! Moderator Note Posts by Banshii and JustinW have been moved to the trash. Using some elese's thread to promote your own pet theory is hijacking. You may bring up such discussion in a thread that you have introduced, but limit it to that thread. My intent is not to hijack. My intent is to reply to the thread and questions asked me. I have stated, "Gravity is a perceptual illusion." I have also expressed a willingness to provide models if persons are willing to set aside certain presuppositions that would make understanding my models impossible. I have a few private conversations actively discussing models that unfortunately can't fit into your rules. I do understand your complaint and will keep my critiques minimized. I do plan on starting a FB group or two that can focus on higher-level understandings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 My intent is not to hijack. My intent is to reply to the thread and questions asked me. I have stated, "Gravity is a perceptual illusion." I have also expressed a willingness to provide models if persons are willing to set aside certain presuppositions that would make understanding my models impossible. You have repeatedly refused to provide any sort of model. What are these "presuppositions" that you object to? That models should be useful and able to make quantitative, testable predictions? Sorry, but that is what science expects. Maybe you are in the wrong place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 My intent is not to hijack. And yet you have just done so, again. My intent is to reply to the thread and questions asked me. I have stated, "Gravity is a perceptual illusion." I have also expressed a willingness to provide models if persons are willing to set aside certain presuppositions that would make understanding my models impossible. Perceptual illusions were not part of the OP, and are not the answer posed by mainstream physics, so that conjecture is indeed a hijack. I have a few private conversations actively discussing models that unfortunately can't fit into your rules. I do understand your complaint and will keep my critiques minimized. I do plan on starting a FB group or two that can focus on higher-level understandings. If "minimized" is anything > 0 with respect to rules violations, then we still have a problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts