Chikis Posted February 19, 2015 Posted February 19, 2015 [MATH]\frac{3.87^3+20}{3.87^3-20}[/MATH] I want solve the above using logarithm. I don't know how to solve it using logarithm because I can't deal with this: [MATH]\frac{10^{(0.5877)3}+10^{1.3010}}{10^{(0.5877)3}-10^{1.3010}}[/MATH] If this is given: [MATH]\frac{3.87^3\times20}{3.87^3\times20}[/MATH] It would have been easiar for me to solve if I add and subtract all the powers that has base 10. Please I need help.
studiot Posted February 19, 2015 Posted February 19, 2015 What is 20 the log of? and what is 3.873 the log of? And what is the log of A added to the log of B the log of?
Chikis Posted February 19, 2015 Author Posted February 19, 2015 (edited) But[MATH]\frac{3.87^3+20}{3.87^3-20}[/MATH] =[MATH]\frac{10^{(0.5877)3}+10^{1.3010}}{10^{(0.5877)3}-10^{1.3010}}[/MATH] What else can I do? Edited February 19, 2015 by Chikis
Chikis Posted February 20, 2015 Author Posted February 20, 2015 Please come to my aid. I have shown my work. I can't make any headway without help.
Nicholas Kang Posted February 20, 2015 Posted February 20, 2015 You should have solved the problem with ease by simply using normal mathematics, bypassing logarithm. Does the question state that logarithm must be used? From post #3, simply add 0.5877(3) and 1.3010 for the upper part and 0.5877(3) minus 1.3010 for the bottom part. You get 10 to the power of [0.5877(3)+1.3010] divides by 10 to the power of [0.5877(3)-1.3010] Then, further simplify the equation and you get 10 to the power of {[0.5877(3)+1.3010]-[0.5877(3)-1.3010]} I can only help with high school maths. Sorry. The answer is approximately 400. Try and see.
Chikis Posted February 20, 2015 Author Posted February 20, 2015 (edited) The answer is incorrect![MATH]\frac{3.87^3+20}{3.87^3-20}[/MATH] = 2.05 I want to solve the problem using logathim and still have the same as when calculating it ordinarly. Edited February 20, 2015 by Chikis
ajb Posted February 20, 2015 Posted February 20, 2015 The answer is approximately 400. Try and see. How did you get 400? A simple approximation of 3.87 as 4 shows that the value is close to 2 (as Chikis states) and not close to 400.
studiot Posted February 20, 2015 Posted February 20, 2015 I think I originally misunderstood you. Why will taking the log(77.960603) and subtracting log(37.960603) and then taking the antilog not give your answer?
ajb Posted February 20, 2015 Posted February 20, 2015 Why will taking the log(77.960603) and subtracting log(37.960603) and then taking the antilog not give your answer? It will of course. I was wondering if the OP was looking for some clever simplification here. I cannot see anything past your suggestion. The log is not not linear so nothing nice will happen with the sum.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now