Disproving Parallel Universes; (Paradox)

[Mr. Astrophysicist]

Before arguing that it's possibly the most intellectual theory, and I should shut up or shut it, then just hear me out. Parallel universes are thought as infinite, and as it could go on forever and beyond space and time are other universes that perhaps defies the laws of physics and logic cannot be. Pigs shall fly in one universe, so on and so forth. But what are universes in? Are there a spheric figure or cubic shape that stands on time and space itself? Universes are actually thought to be infinite and is creating several stars and is expanding, and is actually incalculable of its diameters and shape due to our current technology, but if there were universes and they being spheres or other shapes, they would expand into each other, thus this coming to an end of earth and our lives, other theories suggest the big crunch, big freeze, so on, to our beliefs. One of my theories is the Speed Light Frame Theory; where our universe suddenly come to a stop. But I have a religion, so I would disregard that possibility. If you would like to read it, here: http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/87848-light-speed-frame-theory/

 

I will come to explain more of this on a later episode, but as of right now, I'm disproving Stephen Hawking's theory. Universe on a standstill of space and time, will have expand and collide into each other, and we have no evidence of us colliding into one, we cannot accept this theory, furthermore, and one thing I cannot fathom and could conclude to a infinite paradox; There would be a universe that would explode in order to destroy or destruct our universe, but there would be another universe that wouldn't allow that to happen thus, protecting our universe some how. However, there would be another universe that would destroy that, so on and so forth. This what I call the Universe Destruction Error Paradox (or UDEP) is what I'd like to call. But our universe should be actually destroyed by now, so this theory cannot be. While some say it might continue on and it being impossible for us to be destroyed, another universe would be there, and it might be true. But what if there was a universe faster than anything? Even than light. Our universe could just be wiped off the moment. It's impossible for this theory to be. Unlike other paradoxes, this could not be simpler. What do you think?

*Psst, how old do you think I am?*

Edited February 21, 2015 by Jordyn Rahizel

[swansont]

One of my theories is the Speed Light Frame Theory; where our universe suddenly come to a stop. But I have a religion, so I would disregard that possibility. If you would like to read it, here: http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/87848-light-speed-frame-theory/

 

!

Moderator Note

Please take a moment and re-read the rules you agreed to follow when you joined. Advertising other threads in speculations is a violation.

 

Don't respond to this mod note in the thread.