CasualKilla Posted March 23, 2015 Posted March 23, 2015 The resistance of the source and inductor are set to 0, this must be a mistake right? I was expecting current to stay constant after the source stops pulsing.
John Cuthber Posted March 23, 2015 Posted March 23, 2015 If the source impedance is zero it will "enforce" a zero voltage on the inductor. However the system is poorly defined and real world systems just can't do that . It's probably more helpful to model a resistor and inductor in series.
CasualKilla Posted March 23, 2015 Author Posted March 23, 2015 If the source impedance is zero it will "enforce" a zero voltage on the inductor. However the system is poorly defined and real world systems just can't do that . It's probably more helpful to model a resistor and inductor in series. That is very interesting, I would have thought it would inforce the source voltage.
John Cuthber Posted March 23, 2015 Posted March 23, 2015 And when the pulse is over, and the source voltage falls to zero, it enforces that too.
CasualKilla Posted March 23, 2015 Author Posted March 23, 2015 And when the pulse is over, and the source voltage falls to zero, it enforces that too. Wait, what does it inforce when the pulse is high, also 0 volts??
Enthalpy Posted March 27, 2015 Posted March 27, 2015 (edited) I expect Spice to drift less than that. It has many drawbacks, is useless for general electronics, but at least its algorithm is pretty good. Is there a default value for the series resistance of a voltage source, or the series resistance of an inductor? I don't remember in detail. And what does "1m" mean in the pulse parameters? 1mohm and 1H would drop the current by 10% after 100s just as on the plot. Edited March 27, 2015 by Enthalpy
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now