nec209 Posted April 2, 2015 Posted April 2, 2015 From what I understand fuel efficiency is define by two variables.1 Type of fuel being used.2 The type of engine.Where engineers make the engine more fuel efficient.The type of fuel being used.A fuel that is more densely packed molecules is more fuel efficient than a fuel that is less densely packed molecules. A fuel that is less densely packed molecules is less fuel efficient.We use fossil fuels because it is cheapest out there and the most fuel efficient thus densely packed molecules.
swansont Posted April 2, 2015 Posted April 2, 2015 You also have to have energy liberated under combustion. Water is more dense than gasoline but it's a lousy fuel. But hydrocarbons have lots of potential bonds to make with oxygen.
CasualKilla Posted April 3, 2015 Posted April 3, 2015 With combustion fuels, the efficiency is normally driven by temperature difference between the inside and outside of the engine. Cars in northern canada are much more efficient than cars in Equitorial New-Ginea for example.
swansont Posted April 3, 2015 Posted April 3, 2015 With combustion fuels, the efficiency is normally driven by temperature difference between the inside and outside of the engine. Cars in northern canada are much more efficient than cars in Equitorial New-Ginea for example. I get better gas mileage commuting in 20ºC weather than in 0ºC weather (this morning I got 35mpg, while 25-28 mpg was the norm when the temperatures were colder). The issue is more than a simple application of thermodynamics
nec209 Posted April 6, 2015 Author Posted April 6, 2015 You also have to have energy liberated under combustion. Water is more dense than gasoline but it's a lousy fuel. But hydrocarbons have lots of potential bonds to make with oxygen. The more bonds the more fuel efficient like hydrogen the space shuttle uses. . We use fossil fuels because it is cheapest out there and the most fuel efficient thus it also has the most bonds. Like hydrogen fuel that rockets use is the most dense fuel. With combustion fuels, the efficiency is normally driven by temperature difference between the inside and outside of the engine. Cars in northern canada are much more efficient than cars in Equitorial New-Ginea for example. I don't know why they don't discovere or made in lab a super fuel. Just think of car going to gas pumps only two times in month? Or the Concorde a supersonic plane going from New York to LA non stop or from New York to LA and back to New York!! They spend billions on wars but do not spend money to discovere or made in lab a super fuel.
swansont Posted April 6, 2015 Posted April 6, 2015 The more bonds the more fuel efficient like hydrogen the space shuttle uses. . We use fossil fuels because it is cheapest out there and the most fuel efficient thus it also has the most bonds. Like hydrogen fuel that rockets use is the most dense fuel. Liquid hydrogen has a density of 71 g/L. The density has nothing to do with the efficiency. You were on the right track before, saying it's the density of the number of bonds you can remake.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now