Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Say there were no photons, and therfore no light, though electromagnetism is otherwise unaffected. Would a "light" barrier still hold?

 

I understand the question is extremely simplistic.

Posted

Say there were no photons, and therfore no light, though electromagnetism is otherwise unaffected. Would a "light" barrier still hold?

 

I understand the question is extremely simplistic.

 

If by 'light barrier' you mean the barrier of speed of light then the answer is yes. If all electromagnetism still stands (and hence the Special Relativity is valid) massive particles would still be limited by the speed of light and massless particles (of which in absence of photon only gluons will be left) will be required to always travel at the speed of light.

Posted (edited)

hmmm... yeah yeah i get it. Even if there were no propagation of light and that somehow removed the light barrier, then "superluminal" massive particles would still be able to send signals... though that opens up new questions.

 

Well anyway, now lets say that no signal can be detected in any way, superluminal or otherwise. Would just the lack of causality violations be enough to break the light barrier?

Edited by initiate
Posted (edited)

I like to think of the speed of light c, as a universal constant that allows us to mix space and time. In particular as dx has units of length and dt units of duration c dt has units of length. This 'mixing' is mathematically expressed using the Lorentz transformations. Anyway, the causal structure of space-time is written into these transformations and this explicitly depends on c. It 'just happens' that the speed at which photons propagate through space is c. More carefully the speed of light is written into Maxwell's equations, but I think to think of c and the propagation of speed of light as being separate although deeply related things.

 

 

hmmm... what else about electromagnetism is maintaining it from reaching superluminal speeds aside from causality paradoxes?

Well, to answer this properly you need to study a bit more about special relativity and Maxwell's equations. With no details, special relativity is written into Maxwell's equations and you can calculate that the speed of light in vacuum and for non-accelerating observers is always c.

Edited by ajb

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.