StringJunky Posted May 13, 2015 Posted May 13, 2015 (edited) Time "Moves" at different rates, even from a persons head to that of his feet below? Yes. I think scientists, currently, can measure time down to an altitude difference of 30cm. There are experimental devices in progress which can work, theoretically, work to 2cm altitude difference. Edited May 13, 2015 by StringJunky
Alan McDougall Posted May 14, 2015 Posted May 14, 2015 Time "moves" slower in a walkers frame of reference, than it does for a person some distant from him, who she/he is approaching. Thus the Walker" is a tiny weeny bit younger than his/he standing friend
StringJunky Posted May 14, 2015 Posted May 14, 2015 Time "moves" slower in a walkers frame of reference, than it does for a person some distant from him, who she/he is approaching. Thus the Walker" is a tiny weeny bit younger than his/he standing friend That's a result of velocity. differences What you said before is related to gravitational differences.
imatfaal Posted May 14, 2015 Posted May 14, 2015 Time "moves" slower in a walkers frame of reference, than it does for a person some distant from him, who she/he is approaching. Thus the Walker" is a tiny weeny bit younger than his/he standing friend Unless the two start off together and end together then the time dilation is reciprocal (or other scenarios to break symmetry) - both can do their sums as if they are still and the other is moving and both will view the time of the other as being dilated.
Alan McDougall Posted May 15, 2015 Posted May 15, 2015 That's a result of velocity. differences What you said before is related to gravitational differences. I know that, the different parts of the body, say from head to feet are under different gravity forces, The head higher, lesser, the foot greater. Time is also affected by movement/velocity. Thus my two posts! Unless the two start off together and end together then the time dilation is reciprocal (or other scenarios to break symmetry) - both can do their sums as if they are still and the other is moving and both will view the time of the other as being dilated. Yes it all has to do with the frame of reference and the oddness of understanding relativity.
1x0 Posted May 15, 2015 Author Posted May 15, 2015 (edited) Yes it all has to do with the frame of reference and the oddness of understanding relativity. The reference is everything and nothing It is to understand physical value and represent it with the universal language as it is. 1x0 1(any physical value described by the natural number one) Or in our case the hole universe as all space(time), information, energy, matter........ 0: the total abscence of everything or in other words - space(time), information, energy, matter free nothing. The Universe what we inspect is a cascade of events evolved from the physical nothing to everything what we see. Regardless from the circumstances of existence everything in the system exist in the same moment of reality(A létezés körülményeitöl függetlenül a rendeszerben lévö összes elem egy idöpillanatban létezik.) On the level of information we are at least 13.8 billion years old. The matematical tool what we use has to respect the value presented as physical reality. Mathematics is the projected explanation. It is the language which can explain physical reality. If a higher intelligence existing 1 billion LY away in the same moment of reality and it could ask you: Do you understand mathematical reality? Could you answer? The operations of mathematics has to follow the observed reality. 1x0 We are not alone, We have a busy Universe but we can not read in it. Time is information about the physical reality. Edited May 15, 2015 by 1x0
Alan McDougall Posted May 16, 2015 Posted May 16, 2015 The reference is everything and nothing It is to understand physical value and represent it with the universal language as it is. 1x0 1(any physical value described by the natural number one) Or in our case the hole universe as all space(time), information, energy, matter........ 0: the total abscence of everything or in other words - space(time), information, energy, matter free nothing. The Universe what we inspect is a cascade of events evolved from the physical nothing to everything what we see. Regardless from the circumstances of existence everything in the system exist in the same moment of reality(A létezés körülményeitöl függetlenül a rendeszerben lévö összes elem egy idöpillanatban létezik.) On the level of information we are at least 13.8 billion years old. The matematical tool what we use has to respect the value presented as physical reality. Mathematics is the projected explanation. It is the language which can explain physical reality. If a higher intelligence existing 1 billion LY away in the same moment of reality and it could ask you: Do you understand mathematical reality? Could you answer? The operations of mathematics has to follow the observed reality. 1x0 We are not alone, We have a busy Universe but we can not read in it. Time is information about the physical reality. Are you hinting that I do not understand the subject, and want to put me right
1x0 Posted May 16, 2015 Author Posted May 16, 2015 Are you hinting that I do not understand the subject, and want to put me right I suggest that we have misconceptions in the language of the Universe. Right no it feels it is supporting a human conception or mental structure rather then the operations in physical reality.
swansont Posted May 16, 2015 Posted May 16, 2015 The reference is everything and nothing It is to understand physical value and represent it with the universal language as it is. 1x0 1(any physical value described by the natural number one) Or in our case the hole universe as all space(time), information, energy, matter........ 0: the total abscence of everything or in other words - space(time), information, energy, matter free nothing. ! Moderator Note That's the same nonscience that got your thread(s) locked. They are off-topic, and you may not bring the discussion up again.
1x0 Posted May 16, 2015 Author Posted May 16, 2015 (edited) ! Moderator Note That's the same nonscience that got your thread(s) locked. They are off-topic, and you may not bring the discussion up again. Please Swansont give a physical example where 1*0=0 or any other observable explanation for this axiom. Edited May 16, 2015 by 1x0
swansont Posted May 16, 2015 Posted May 16, 2015 Please Swansont give a physical example where 1*0=0 or any other observable explanation for this axiom. ! Moderator Note No. That thread was closed, and now this one is, too. Thanks for playing.
Recommended Posts