ydoaPs Posted March 30, 2005 Posted March 30, 2005 i can see the f(g(bla bla bla)) way, but how do you do it the other way. maybe i should just wait until you get to it. edit: it would appear that with logarithms, you do what i said a few posts ago.
ydoaPs Posted April 1, 2005 Posted April 1, 2005 here are some differentiation rule thingys: if u, v, and w are differentiable functions, and c and m are constants, then: [math]\frac{d}{dy}©=0[/math] [math]\frac{d}{dy}(x)=1[/math] [math]\frac{d}{dy}(u+v+...)=\frac{d}{dy}(u)+\frac{d}{dy}(v)+...[/math] [math]\frac{d}{dy}(cu)=c\frac{d}{dy}(u)[/math] [math]\frac{d}{dy}(uv)=u\frac{d}{dy}(v)+v\frac{d}{dy}(u)[/math] [math]\frac{d}{dy}(uvw)=uv\frac{d}{dy}(w)+uw\frac{d}{dy}(v)+vw\frac{d}{dy}(u)[/math] [math]\frac{d}{dy}(\frac{u}{c})=\frac{1}{c}\frac{d}{dy}(u),c\not=0[/math] [math]\frac{d}{dy}(\frac{c}{u})=c\frac{d}{dy}(\frac{1}{u})=-\frac{c}{u^2}\frac{d}{dy}(u),u\not=0[/math] [math]\frac{d}{dy}(\frac{u}{v})=\frac{v\frac{d}{dy}(u)-u\frac{d}{dy}(v)}{v^2},v\not=0[/math] [math]\frac{d}{dy}(x^m)=mx^{m-1}[/math] [math]\frac{d}{dy}(u^m)=mu^{m-1}\frac{d}{dy}(u)[/math] ha dave, i beat you to it.
Dave Posted April 1, 2005 Author Posted April 1, 2005 Yeah... great. But seriously, how many people are following this? If it's just the above then I'm not going to bother writing any more.
Dave Posted April 1, 2005 Author Posted April 1, 2005 Re: chain rule (on IRC): Chain rule basically says [math]\frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{dy}{du} \frac{du}{dx}[/math]. So lets suppose you've got the function [math]e^{x^2}[/math]. The first step is to let [math]u = x^2[/math]. Then we have that [math]y = e^u[/math]. Hence: [math]\frac{dy}{du} = e^u[/math] [math]\frac{du}{dx} = 2x[/math] So [math]\frac{dy}{dx} = 2x e^u = 2x e^{x^2}[/math].
ydoaPs Posted April 1, 2005 Posted April 1, 2005 ok, i'm just stupid. it is the same thing written a different way
Ducky Havok Posted April 2, 2005 Posted April 2, 2005 Suppose you want to build a rectangular paddock to contain some sheep. You want to maximize the area of your paddock because you want to fit as many sheep in as possible' date=' and you have 300m of fencing available to you. Find the maximum area.[/quote'] Nobody answered your easier question so I figured I would. [math]A=LW[/math] and [math]2L+2W=300[/math] [math]W=150-L[/math] so [math]A=150L-L^2[/math] [math]da=150-2L [/math] The maximum is when da is equal to 0, so [math]0=150-2L [/math] [math]L=75[/math] When you solve for w, you get 75, so the overall area is [math] 5625 m^2 [/math]
ydoaPs Posted April 2, 2005 Posted April 2, 2005 i got that answer using simple arithmatic. i divided 300 by for then squared it.
Ducky Havok Posted April 2, 2005 Posted April 2, 2005 Yes, its easy to do it using arithmatic or common sense. The most area is of course going to be a square. But the point was to use calculus I think
ydoaPs Posted April 2, 2005 Posted April 2, 2005 yes, but if you are lazy, like me, it is tempting to go the path of least resistance.
ydoaPs Posted April 2, 2005 Posted April 2, 2005 is [math]\frac{\partial}{{\partial}t}[/math] the same as [math]\frac{d}{dt}[/math]?
Dave Posted April 2, 2005 Author Posted April 2, 2005 No. The former is called a partial derivatives and deals with function of more than one variable. I'd rather not get into that though.
ydoaPs Posted April 4, 2005 Posted April 4, 2005 for three functions is the chain rule [math]D_x(f(g(h(x))))=f'(g(h(x)))g'(h(x))h'(x)[/math], and [math]D_x(f(g(h(i(x)))))=f'(g(h(x)))g'(h(x))h'(i(x))i'(x)[/math] for four, ...?
Dave Posted April 4, 2005 Author Posted April 4, 2005 Argh! Too many brackets The idea is right though
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now