The theory of life

[zzzoli23]

I have a simple theory about life. Maybe you will think I am crazy, but think about it, there is a small border between genius and mad. The science says that, the simplest theory is the true, and you need only a small imagined thing to believe this theory. If you want to imagine the unlimited, infinite world, you need to think about it like a circle in a circle in a circle, till the number of worlds. The inner circle is this world. When the world peace comes, the science and technology of the humans will be significantly better, and they will be able to create a machine what can connect the minds, share the experiences and imagination, and create an artificial dream, which seems completely real. This will be necessary for the young peoples and for the peoples who couldn’t learnt to live and respect life, to find the inner peace. (The constant fear of the women is necessary and happens for a reason. The reason is, without this the woman wouldn’t need a man, there would be a lot of relationship (because woman understand each other easier) and we couldn’t multiply)

The reason why there is war in the world, because we need to reach our own peace. In our self and in the world as well. To make this happen the life provides colourful personalities, and a special situation. The life and the Creator has made the way for our self to find out the simplest, most logical theory about life, about existence. There is only war in one world, after this we have a lot of life which is always peaceful. The life created so precisely this proves there is a bigger Intelligence than us.

We are far away from this technology, first we need to invent the organic technologies, and maybe the artificial intelligence is necessary as well. This is not a simple theory, this is the future.

To read this can cause a sudden trauma for the brain, if you feel mentally unwell after you have read this contact with a psychologist, psychiatrist.

Don’t panic, we are responsible about our future, we shouldn’t crate chaos because of a new theory. The world is not gonna change quickly, first humans need a new hope. Just be a bit nicer, dearer with others, and show to the rich peoples we are strong enough to change. I know there is a better, more peaceful future where the rich peoples can keep their richness, because we finally realise there is no happiness in money, we need to find our own happiness by use our wise mind and become more conscious, more mindfulness.

[swansont]

!

Moderator Note

Please read our guidelines for posting speculations. This doesn't seem up to the threshold

[Phi for All]

I have a simple theory about life. Maybe you will think I am crazy, but think about it, there is a small border between genius and mad. The science says that, the simplest theory is the true, and you need only a small imagined thing to believe this theory.

Occam's Razor says the simplest explanation is most likely correct (I don't like to use the word "true" in science). It gives one a place to start looking, but one shouldn't assume it's correct.

 

If you want to imagine the unlimited, infinite world, you need to think about it like a circle in a circle in a circle, till the number of worlds.

Do you mean this world? This world is not infinite, and we're not sure the whole universe is unlimited.

 

Or do you mean the many-worlds interpretation, where all possible alternative events happen in their own universe? That's far from a simple theory.

 

The inner circle is this world. When the world peace comes, the science and technology of the humans will be significantly better, and they will be able to create a machine what can connect the minds, share the experiences and imagination, and create an artificial dream, which seems completely real. This will be necessary for the young peoples and for the peoples who couldn’t learnt to live and respect life, to find the inner peace.

This is a prediction that needs some supportive evidence to be science. Prediction is a powerful tool, but without sound science to back it up, it's just guessing. Or the script for The Matrix.

 

(The constant fear of the women is necessary and happens for a reason. The reason is, without this the woman wouldn’t need a man, there would be a lot of relationship (because woman understand each other easier) and we couldn’t multiply)

You're making some very generalized assumptions here. Constant fear? Who is constantly afraid of women? The way this reads makes it seem like you're saying if men weren't afraid of women, women would be drawn to other women and we'd all die off. Unbelievably hard to support this, since it's trivially easy to discredit each element of the argument. Perhaps I've misunderstood?

 

The reason why there is war in the world, because we need to reach our own peace. In our self and in the world as well. To make this happen the life provides colourful personalities, and a special situation. The life and the Creator has made the way for our self to find out the simplest, most logical theory about life, about existence. There is only war in one world, after this we have a lot of life which is always peaceful. The life created so precisely this proves there is a bigger Intelligence than us.

We are far away from this technology, first we need to invent the organic technologies, and maybe the artificial intelligence is necessary as well. This is not a simple theory, this is the future.

To read this can cause a sudden trauma for the brain, if you feel mentally unwell after you have read this contact with a psychologist, psychiatrist.

Don’t panic, we are responsible about our future, we shouldn’t crate chaos because of a new theory. The world is not gonna change quickly, first humans need a new hope. Just be a bit nicer, dearer with others, and show to the rich peoples we are strong enough to change. I know there is a better, more peaceful future where the rich peoples can keep their richness, because we finally realise there is no happiness in money, we need to find our own happiness by use our wise mind and become more conscious, more mindfulness.

There's not a lot of science to comment on here. Bringing up a capital C "Creator" doesn't help, nor does claiming that adaptation proves a higher intelligence. You're assuming right away that a theory of life/existence MUST be simple. This makes sense to you, so you call it logical.

 

The rest seems more like philosophy, or even politics. They don't help your scientific argument because they're so obviously opinion.

 

To add some science in here, we need some clarification. What are "the organic technologies"? Why do you think peace for all is preferable? Isn't it possible that many of the bad things we've done (war) has led to a greater understanding of the good things we're capable of (medicine)?

 

Can you support any of your ideas with evidence we could check? Otherwise, it's all guesswork and you can do that anywhere. Most people come here because they want some science discussion.

[andrewcellini]

I have a simple theory about life. Maybe you will think I am crazy, but think about it, there is a small border between genius and mad.

i'm not sure i can agree with this. it is usually quite clear when someone is exhibiting psychosis (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychosis#Signs_and_symptoms) which i presume you mean by mad. or you could be using it as delusional in a less severe, perhaps more "religious devotion" sense, which would also be quite clear if you could not provide evidence for your "theory" and kept on believing in it.

 

what you've presented isn't a theory in the scientific sense. it's an idea that's you've thought about for a little while, and it makes predictions which are vague and are potentially unfalsifiable. you jump quickly from one facet of your "theory" to another without any real explanation. how does any assumption about an "unlimited world" lead to discussion about war and world peace?

Edited May 18, 2015 by andrewcellini

[Delta1212]

Occam's Razor says the simplest explanation is most likely correct (I don't like to use the word "true" in science). It gives one a place to start looking, but one shouldn't assume it's correct.

 

And even then, the definition of "simple" being used is atypical. It's actually the explanation with the fewest assumptions that is most likely to be correct. You can have a quite complex explanation, but if it rests on fewer assumptions than a "simpler" explanation, then it is more likely to be correct.

[zzzoli23]

if I would write the experience here what helped me to realise this I would seem 3 times crazier. Why is it so hard to imagine we will have technology to read and connect minds?

[Phi for All]

if I would write the experience here what helped me to realise this I would seem 3 times crazier. Why is it so hard to imagine we will have technology to read and connect minds?

 

Because you came to a science discussion site. Because you posted this as a theory, and imagining isn't what you do in a scientific theory.

 

I think you may not understand what "theory" really means in science. It's not just a "What if this was possible?" statement. A theory is the best you can ever get, the most intensely studied and tested explanations we have to define reality. Theories have mountains of evidence to support them.

 

I think we assumed you came here because you wanted to discuss science in a rigorous manner. There are other sites that welcome imaginative guesswork, but we like evidence to back up our speculations.

 

 

 

Even though you didn't answer ANY of my questions, I will answer yours. "Why is it so hard to imagine we will have technology to read and connect minds?" It's not, it's the easiest thing in the world. When I was young, a LOT of people imagined we'd all be driving around in flying cars. It was easy to imagine, easy to see that's where the technology must be leading us.

 

But our imaginations were wrong. Flying cars are completely impractical. Can you truly not see why the same might be true of reading and connecting human minds? The answer to your question is, there are some things we CAN do, but as yet we have no good reason to, or many good reasons not to.

[ACG52]

He's been spamming the same posts across other forums.