rasen58 Posted June 3, 2015 Posted June 3, 2015 Find the speed of a 3 kg mass when it reaches the 10 m mark. The net force is in the same direction as the motion. Moving on straight line (rectilinear) I think I'd have to use net work = change in kinetic energy theorem here. Since the net work would be the area under the force position graph, I counted the boxes under the graph. So I tried just counting all the boxes and got (around?) 39 boxes. I then multipled that by 20 since each box is 20 N and got 780 N Since W = F *d = 780 N * 10 m = 7800 N*m So 7800 = .5 m v^2 Solving for v, I got 22.8 m/s. But the answer is actually 24. I think that's due to me not counting the correct number of boxes? or is there a different way or a better way to approximate how many boxes are under the graph? Thanks
imatfaal Posted June 4, 2015 Posted June 4, 2015 0. It is a force distance graph not a force time graph 1. The area under the graph is not F - it is already Fd - ie work. You don't need to re-multiply it by 10metres - you have already done that by counting the boxes under the graph 2. So 7800 = .5 m v^2 Solving for v, I got 22.8 m/s. There is a maths error here. [latex]7800 = \frac{1}{2}mv^2[/latex] [latex]\sqrt{\frac{2*7800}{3}}=v=72.1 [/latex] If however you use correct work per point 1 above [latex]780 = \frac{1}{2}mv^2[/latex] [latex]\sqrt{\frac{2*780}{3}}=v=22.80 [/latex] 3. There is a better way of approximating - though it is quite involved. a. you know quadratic (you are told it is a parabola) is y=ax^2+bx+c b. passes through origin so set x and y to zero and solve for c c. assume that points (2,80) and (8,80) are on the line (they look perfect) d. set simulatenous equations for y=ax^2+bx+c ; you have two points and already know c so these are solvable e. you can check by solving your new equation and getting correct roots x=0 and x=10 and by differentiating at getting max at x=5 f. integrate your new equation from x=0 to x=10 g. plug new figure for area under the graph into Work Done = KE h. I get just over 23 and a half. i. I can go through process if I havent explained it properly 1
rasen58 Posted June 6, 2015 Author Posted June 6, 2015 Okay thank you for the corrections on all those points!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now