VxVxV

[Mitch Bass]

so a source tells me about Velocity x Vector x Volume as something to do with an explanaton for all activity from the macro to the micro...I'm hearing that this explanation allows for easily repicable working models and utilizes not gravity, nor any of the other three forces but yet can mimic all known activity ....comparing the quantum world and relativistic stop making sense as both are considered moving for the same reasons but with only apparent, but not actual, difference in terms of consequential activity. I tried incorporating the VxVxV into a post offering an explanation as to the "erratic " movement of a towel let go. i do not want to be accussed of hijacking the topic but i I doubt my contribution to that post allowed for a greater understanding. Really, all i am requesting, is if anyone knows about the potential legitimacy of the name of this post i started being an equation that is a central part to a cutting edge understanding of the universe or am I getting compeletly false intell?

[Mordred]

Your getting false Intel. First ask yourself a key question. Vector of what? A vector is simply a measurement that has a scalar value and a direction.

For example velocity is a vector. It is a measure of speed with a direction.

Now take temperature, it is a scalar quantity just like speed is.

One other detail the quantum world uses relativity as well. The problem between the two has to do with quantifying gravity which is the weakest of the four forces at the quantum (particle) level.

[swansont]

Either something is missing in the translation or your intel is bad. Velocity x Vector x Volume makes no sense.

[imatfaal]

!

Moderator Note

moved to Speculations.