saudireports Posted March 29, 2005 Posted March 29, 2005 speaking of physics the weapons they got now much more powerful then they had in ww2 the big stuff now is like 30 or 40 times bigger then they use on japan so how long do you thing before they blow up the whole world ww3 its fast real real fast once one of them big one go off anywhere the rest of them start to fly all over the place maybe like 100,000 of them flying everywhere and anywhere it happens fast real real fast just push the button that's fast
saudireports Posted March 29, 2005 Author Posted March 29, 2005 dude, like that post was like fast. i mean fast! but there're alot faster
ecoli Posted March 29, 2005 Posted March 29, 2005 speaking of physics the weapons they got now much more powerful then they had in ww2 the big stuff now is like 30 or 40 times bigger then they use on japan so how long do you thing before they blow up the whole world ww3 its fast real real fast once one of them big one go off anywhere the rest of them start to fly all over the place maybe like 100' date='000 of them flying everywhere and anywhere it happens fast real real fast just push the button that's fast[/quote'] You should consider including punctuation in your posts. That would make reading them easier. I hope we never have to use nuclear, or nuclear-like weapons again. It might, as you say, cause a chain reaction that could destroy the enitre world. I trust that all the nuclear powers realize this, and would never use them (*cough...Kim Jong-il...cough* )
saudireports Posted March 29, 2005 Author Posted March 29, 2005 You should consider including punctuation in your posts. That would make reading them easier. I hope we never have to use nuclear' date=' or nuclear-like weapons again. It might, as you say, cause a chain reaction that could destroy the enitre world. I trust that all the nuclear powers realize this, and would never use them (*cough...Kim Jong-il...cough* )[/quote'] you people overpopulate the world to death(your true political basis) creating wars starvation poverty crime etc worldwide trying to say violence is illegal except your violence because yours is the good violence. no no no they are going to blow up the world and it happens fast real fast, how long does it take to push a button!
ecoli Posted March 29, 2005 Posted March 29, 2005 you say "you" as if you are not part of this world...
Macroscopic Posted March 29, 2005 Posted March 29, 2005 you people overpopulate the world to death(your true political basis) creating wars starvation poverty crime etc worldwide trying to say violence is illegal except your violence because yours is the good violence. no no no they are going to blow up the world and it happens fast real fast' date=' how long does it take to push a button![/quote'] Between the illogical conclusion and bad grammar, you lost me.
Phi for All Posted March 29, 2005 Posted March 29, 2005 you people overpopulate the world to death(your true political basis) creating wars starvation poverty crime etc worldwide trying to say violence is illegal except your violence because yours is the good violence. no no no they are going to blow up the world and it happens fast real fast' date=' how long does it take to push a button![/quote']Well, you've led this thread out of Modern/Theoretical Physics, so I'm moving it into Politics. Btw, treason, also known as saudireports, flip out like you did last night and I'll ban your whole IP address. Registering under a different user name buys you one more chance at being civil. Please use this reprieve wisely.
ecoli Posted March 29, 2005 Posted March 29, 2005 Btw' date=' treason, also known as saudireports, flip out like you did last night and I'll ban your whole IP address. Registering under a different user name buys you one more chance at being civil. Please use this reprieve wisely.[/quote'] Ha! I knew I recognized that writing style from a different user!
TimeTraveler Posted March 29, 2005 Posted March 29, 2005 Hopefully we learn from history and WW3 never happens. It doesn't need to, the remaining resources can be shared, dependancy of resources by all can be minimized. We need to ween ourselves from our addiction of mass consumption. Peace throughout the world, at least relative peace without major conflict, is not unreasonable or utopian ideal, it is necessary and possible. ww3 is the war that will end all war, and quite possibly human existance. Hopefully the world gets its act together before it takes place. Although the Bush administration has laid the foundation for which it may take place. my 2 cents.
Rakdos Posted March 29, 2005 Posted March 29, 2005 I just thought of a really cool side response to thes: I know not what weapons world war 3 will be fought with but world war 4 will be fought with sticks and stones.
TimeTraveler Posted March 29, 2005 Posted March 29, 2005 I just thought of a really cool side response to thes: I know not what weapons world war 3 will be fought with but world war 4 will be fought with sticks and stones. Isn't that an Einstein quote?
Pangloss Posted March 29, 2005 Posted March 29, 2005 Yes. Although how the peoples of the post-apocalyptic world are going to manage all that intercontinental travel is beyond me. Cash in their frequent-outrigger miles, I suppose.
Skye Posted March 29, 2005 Posted March 29, 2005 ww3 is the war that will end all war, and quite possibly human existance. Hopefully the world gets its act together before it takes place. Although the Bush administration has laid the foundation for which it may take place. WWI was the war to end all war. Obviously there were translation problems when this was being explained to Hitler.
Rakdos Posted March 29, 2005 Posted March 29, 2005 Isn't that an Einstein quote? it could be i got it from a 100 page list ot taglines of old BBS so yes could be
Aardvark Posted March 29, 2005 Posted March 29, 2005 you people overpopulate the world to death(your true political basis) creating wars starvation poverty crime etc worldwide trying to say violence is illegal except your violence because yours is the good violence. Who are you refering to? no no no they are going to blow up the world and it happens fast real fast, how long does it take to push a button! What makes you think that? After all why would anybody, even an evil 'you' want to do that?
Anarchaus Posted April 3, 2005 Posted April 3, 2005 i think that we could use thermonuclear mines to do large scale construction projects, like a big resevoir for water storage. But only after we find a clean way to do it, like if we find out how to create a pure fusion device. No more flooding mountain valleys and killing wildlife!!
Sayonara Posted April 3, 2005 Posted April 3, 2005 You don't think a thermonuclear mine might have a slightly negative effect on wildlife?
Ophiolite Posted April 3, 2005 Posted April 3, 2005 It's part of the ABP [Anarchaus BioDiversity Program]: increased speciation through the application of environmental extremities and accelerated mutation rates.
AtomicMX Posted April 8, 2005 Posted April 8, 2005 Hmm in another hand, i hardly think you can blow up the whole world, i mean, there is no such that quantity of material. perhaps you can destoy the surface but.... with this same technology we would make a lot of bunkers and stuff... but, blowing up the world, is hmmmm some sort of imposible with nukes...
Aardvark Posted April 8, 2005 Posted April 8, 2005 Hmm in another hand, i hardly think you can blow up the whole world, i mean, there is no such that quantity of material. perhaps you can destoy the surface but.... with this same technology we would make a lot of bunkers and stuff... but, blowing up the world, is hmmmm some sort of imposible with nukes... No one has suggested that the world would be blown up. Rather, that the radioactivity released from these explosions would be a problem. The USSR had quite a developed programme for peaceful industrial use of nuclear explosives. Creating underground reserviors, altering watercourses and aiding mineral extraction. Unfortunately even the Soviets found the environmental problems to be unacceptable.
AtomicMX Posted April 8, 2005 Posted April 8, 2005 so how long do you thing before they blow up the whole world Was the first post.
Aardvark Posted April 15, 2005 Posted April 15, 2005 Was the first post. I was specifically responding to the suggestion that underground nuclear explosives used for civil engininering could blow up the world. The objections centre around environmental hazards not global destruction.
Kylonicus Posted April 30, 2005 Posted April 30, 2005 Pure fusion devices do exist. They use a pulse laser to set'em off. That was done somewhere in the 70's.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now