Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I was wondering if there is anything in particle or theoretical physics that explicitly says that it's impossible for a particle to travel faster than the speed of light. Is it still in the realm of possibility?

 

What if particles had no other option other than to go faster than the speed of light? Could a warp bubble form around it, until some superluminal friction pushed it back below the speed of light? Perhaps the excess energy would be displaced in the form of an increased amplitude gravitational wave?

 

This is for a science fiction universe but I promised myself I would at least keep it plausible.

 

I was hoping to use this concept for a propellantless propulsion drive. Basically a particle accelerator that pushed particles faster than the speed of light, then pushes more particles, which push on those particles, and off space-time itself.

Edited by 3blake7
Posted

What if particles had no other option other than to go faster than the speed of light? Could a warp bubble form around it, until some superluminal friction pushed it back below the speed of light? Perhaps the excess energy would be displaced in the form of an increased amplitude gravitational wave?

 

This is for a science fiction universe but I promised myself I would at least keep it plausible.

 

I was hoping to use this concept for a propellantless propulsion drive. Basically a particle accelerator that pushed particles faster than the speed of light, then pushes more particles, which push on those particles, and off space-time itself.

 

IIRC as tachyons lose energy they speed up, rather than slow down.

 

AFAIK there is no physics that allows one to jump across the barrier of traveling above/below c. If a superluminal particle existed, it would remain superluminal.

Posted (edited)

Okay. I will just stick with my particle accelerator thrusters, with 99.9% of lightspeed exhaust velocities. It's a capable propulsion engine.

Edited by 3blake7
Posted

If a superluminal particle existed, it would remain superluminal.

Or decay into standard particles very quickly, which is what we think would happen in quantum field theory.

Posted

Or decay into standard particles very quickly, which is what we think would happen in quantum field theory.

 

Yes. I should say: as long as this hypothetical superluminal particle existed, it would remain superluminal

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.