Homonormativity and humans ?

[Sathanas]

so,

I was passing by,

and I saw it there,

I am perpelexed.

 

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

http://www.humansexualevolution.com

 

The theory of human sexual evolution appearing on this website was first published in two installments in the Journal of the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association in 2000 (True Nature – A Theory Of Human Sexual Evolution, C. Gomes, JGLMA Vol.4, No.1 and JGLMA Vol.4, No.2)

 

...

 

!

Moderator Note

Huge snip by Moderator. This all looks copyrighted to me - and even if it is not then we do not want huge swathes of text taken from other websites.

 

Please ask a direct question on facts, ideas or assertions that are presented on this forum, by you and in your words. If you wish to lend credence to your contentions then you can provide links to other websites as reference.

...

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

now, can anyone tell me whether this is right or wrong or both ?

[imatfaal]

locked whist I sort out copyright issues

unlocked

 

!

Moderator Note

 

Further to my note above. Please formulate any question you might have here and provide the background to that question. Posting what seems like an entire academic paper and then asking if it is right or not is unlikely to lead to substantive and focussed discussions. If you cannot be bothered to form a succinct question in your own terms then why should members be expected to answer it.

 

[Sathanas]

well , too little of a discussion,

 

the theory, as it asserts normative homosexuality among humans through 'non existence of sexual instinct', essentially negateting the need for male female interactions.

 

i have questions

 

1. does human sexual instinct exist ?

 

2. the existence of two distinct sexes, is , perhaps itself human sexual instinct, isn't it ?

the difference between physical and mental aspects of both the sexes may be is an ' 'instinct' like ' itself i.e the opposite sexes should have greater curiosity of exploration, therefore greater drive towards each other and attraction, after all attraction is continued curiosity. and i base this upon on genders, i do think gender has much too do with current sex than what is going in brain.

 

3. and is recreational sex between male and female possible, without using any external contraception ?

the author uses this to establish higher homosexual interactions than heterosexual ones. derives the result - normative homosexuality

 

{ though intelligence, thinking ability, is too natural extenstion, and i suppose invention of condoms is natural too, as opposite sex gives more 'thrills', another step towards complexity, greater interactions with the other of species. }

 

and i suppose maybe the whole theory is built up on like this :

 

'no' sexual instinct in humans,

same sexes being like minded ,

have more chances of interactions ( essentially overlooking the fact curiosity towards opposite sex )

no natural contraception, therefore no recreational heterosexuality ( prepubersent female bonobos have sex with older males and about sex after menopause )

( i personally donot think ejaculation is much of a involuntary process )

Edited August 30, 2015 by Sathanas