Jump to content

Space vacuum magnetic energy


acsinuk

Recommended Posts

We know that space has an above zero temperature so an empty volume of space must contain some massless energy that could be magnetic. As free space has magnetic permeability then E=1/2*L*I^2 per metre cube.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We know that space has an above zero temperature so an empty volume of space must contain some massless energy that could be magnetic.

 

If it were empty, then it couldn't have a temperature.

 

What is "massless energy"?

 

What is the connection between "massless energy" and magnetism?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We know that space has an above zero temperature so an empty volume of space must contain some massless energy that could be magnetic. As free space has magnetic permeability then E=1/2*L*I^2 per metre cube.

This has been measured, the universe on large scales is magnetically neutral

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Energy creates gravitation too, so "massless" is a dangerous idea.

 

If the temperature of said vacuum is for instance that of a black body, and say at 2.7K, then the microwave power passing through a surface is known (as well as the energy contained in a volume). Better than 0.5*LI2 which doesn't apply easily here (the currents are polarization rather than conduction), the Poynting vector gives a mean value for the electric and magnetic fields.

 

1m2 of black body at 2.7K radiates 3µW and receives as much from its surroundings. This, and vacuum's 377 ohm impedance, makes an average E=34mV/m spread over hundreds of GHz and H=90µA/m, B=0.1nT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Enthalpy,

A splendid answer at last and sensible attempt at the maths. Does your calculation take into account that the voltage is at right angles to the polarized current field.

BTW I once calculated the solar wind voltage to be 500 volts per metre from the average speed at which the H+ ions must travel from sun to earth; so your E=34mV would seem reasonable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.