johnny2710 Posted August 25, 2015 Author Posted August 25, 2015 econlmics is my degree., thanks., this career is the best as the best., thanks. I am really high in this career., you believe in God. if you are an ignorant person., please dont put your oxygen words. -4
Phi for All Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 I am really high in this career., you believe in God. I believe in god., this is why my theory cant be replaced. ! Moderator Note Please, this section is for science speculation. Religion is completely off-topic. We are one of the few science discussion sites with a Religion section, please keep religious discussions in that section. They aren't appropriate here. Thanks for understanding.
ajb Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 (edited) I am very stupid., yes I know. I don't think you are stupid, just very naive. We see this a lot here. People are just not aware of what is expected of them in order to make contributions to science. what is your ages.,I think that my age is much less than you., but,please. You are younger than I, but so what? The point is you have shown lack of experience and knowledge. This you can do something about. , I dont know physics., if you thing that is bad., thanks., Everyone should know some basic physics, but we are not talking about that. You claimed to have made some contribution to modern physics, this is just not so. The problem is that you thought you had contributed, or at least said that you have. but this is not my career., is the economics., in this career I am the best in the best., I won championships in my country., thanks. I don't quite follow what you are claiming. Anyway, as you know some economics you know some basic mathematics. That is a good start for reading up on physics. you never could know that I think., I think very profound., in thinking thinks., God can say that I think., not the atheism. As already stated, religion has nothing to do with this. Also, you may think very profound thoughts, but given the evidence we have these are not deep thoughts on physics. Anyway, don't get too discouraged, just do better. If you need further help and advice on reading up on physics just ask in this forum. People will be more than happy to help if they can. Edited August 25, 2015 by ajb 1
johnny2710 Posted August 25, 2015 Author Posted August 25, 2015 please., my theory needs help I was alone., and could any of you give me a hand.
ajb Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 econlmics is my degree., thanks., this career is the best as the best., thanks. I am really high in this career. If you are 18 then you have just started a degree in economics?
johnny2710 Posted August 25, 2015 Author Posted August 25, 2015 we can work in that., I just put that., sorry.
ajb Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 please., my theory needs help I was alone., and could any of you give me a hand. You will need to at first try to explain the basic aspects of your theory, including the basic mathematical framework. I could not get anything useful from your viXra article. That said, as it is so poorly written and so unlike anything I have ever read I did not commit any time to trying to get any physics from it. Given what you have said here, I doubt there is much in it. But I await to be corrected. So, please explain what you can here and work on improving how you present it.
johnny2710 Posted August 25, 2015 Author Posted August 25, 2015 is that I did this theory to put an heliocentric model., if you can help me.?
ajb Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 is that I did this theory to put an heliocentric model., if you can help me.? Your English is making it hard to follow you. What about the heliocentric model of the Solar System?
Sathanas Posted August 30, 2015 Posted August 30, 2015 (edited) is this http://philica.com/display_article.php?article_id=472 yer theory, Joan Manuel Rodriguez Nunez ? Edited August 30, 2015 by Sathanas
johnny2710 Posted August 30, 2015 Author Posted August 30, 2015 you can search in vixra., The toe. with The same. in this case., this theory in philica is incomplete., but you can search., sorry for all., and i dont speak english. is very theoretical., but sorry.
Strange Posted August 30, 2015 Posted August 30, 2015 is very theoretical., but sorry. is very nonsense., but sorry. 1
johnny2710 Posted September 3, 2015 Author Posted September 3, 2015 in a future., we will see the same formula.
swansont Posted September 3, 2015 Posted September 3, 2015 in a future., we will see the same formula. Only because you keep posting it. But it's meaningless. It literally has no meaning. 1
Strange Posted September 3, 2015 Posted September 3, 2015 sorry for all., and i dont speak english. It would be better if you used Google Translate because you have no ability to write in English. "Sería mejor si usted utiliza el Traductor de Google porque no tienes capacidad de escribir en Inglés." https://translate.google.com/
johnny2710 Posted September 3, 2015 Author Posted September 3, 2015 10.^10 to 10^11., thanks. the idea is that the light is ten times the energy the velocity of the light. thanks., mr strange.!!!!! -2
Fuzzwood Posted September 3, 2015 Posted September 3, 2015 Which doesn't make any sense at all. Stop wasting your and our time.
johnny2710 Posted September 3, 2015 Author Posted September 3, 2015 thanks., but the formula is good. -1
Phi for All Posted September 3, 2015 Posted September 3, 2015 thanks., but the formula is good. ! Moderator Note No, johnny2710, it's not. You've been told why. You've ignored the reasons, and just kept changing your numbers without clarifying any units. The formula is worthless. You don't understand enough of the requisite science to do this kind of speculation properly. I'm very sorry, but you need to study more physics before you can contribute in this manner. It would be the same for me if I tried to give you financial formulas. You would tell me I don't know enough about finance, and you would be right. I hope this makes sense. Thread closed. Please don't open any more like this.
Recommended Posts