caledonia Posted September 28, 2015 Posted September 28, 2015 I seek a proof that xn -1 = 0 has a primitive root.
mathematic Posted September 29, 2015 Posted September 29, 2015 (edited) I don't know what you are looking for. All the roots are trivially expressible, and the proof is that they satisfy the equation. [latex]x_k=e^{\frac{2\pi ik}{n}},k=[0,...,n-1][/latex] Edited September 29, 2015 by mathematic
Xerxes Posted September 29, 2015 Posted September 29, 2015 Try induction on [math]x^2-1=0[/math] which has roots [math]\sqrt{1}[/math]. Clearly [math]-1[/math] is primitive since it is not a root for [math]x^1-1=0[/math] i.e. assume for your induction hypothesis that the roots for [math]x^{n-1}-1=0[/math] are [math]^{n-1}\sqrt{1}[/math] BUT beware of multiplicities!
caledonia Posted September 30, 2015 Author Posted September 30, 2015 Thanks for responses. I was thinking about a proof which did not require the explicit identification of a root, but I accept that cos 2pi/n + i sin 2pi/n is indeed a primitive root (of xn = 1).
mathematic Posted September 30, 2015 Posted September 30, 2015 Looking at my original post (exponential form), it is easy to see that for every n, the roots for k=1 and k=n-1 are primitive. In general roots where k/n is in lowest terms (as a fraction), kth root is primitve.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now