ΛCDM still on top

[BlackHole]

Here's some very useful paper i found which corrects the mistakes made in Lerner's plasma cosmology in favor of the ΛCDM model and standard big bang cosmology.

 

http://www.evolutionpages.com/big_bang_no_myth.htm

 

I guess the ΛCDM will remain of top until 2007-2008 LHC experiment which should confirm the existence of the Higgs boson and other supersymmetric particles.

 

I guess that the only good argument against the big bang cosmology is that some redshifts might be intrinsic or that the Friedmann equation might not be reliable at late times.

[Martin]

Here's some very useful paper i found which corrects the mistakes made in Lerner's plasma cosmology in favor of the ?CDM model and standard big bang cosmology.

 

http://www.evolutionpages.com/big_bang_no_myth.htm

 

I guess the ΛCDM will remain of top until 2007-2008 LHC experiment which should confirm the existence of the Higgs boson and other supersymmetric particles.

 

I guess that the only good argument against the big bang cosmology is that some redshifts might be intrinsic or that the Friedmann equation might not be reliable at late times.

 

I think you are right about ΛCDM being on top. It enjoys a broadbased consensus among cosmologists and astronomers in general. But how do I write ΛCDM

 

or ΛCDM

 

if I dont have you to copy and paste from?

[Martin]

I typed & # 923 ;

without the spaces and got a Lambda. but it doesnt survive edits. if I edit the post for any reason then all the "ampersand#923;" go away and I just get a ? question mark.

[BlackHole]

I just copied the sign. Basically it can be written as Lambda-CDM.

 

I didn't like Alec MacAndrew's darwinistic approach. Here's a friendlier correction to plama cosmology by Edward L. Wright.