drdino.com: Creation Science Evangelism

[Hellbender]

ah ok I see now. Another creationist misrepresentation *shakes head*

[juslikecandi]

I dont mean this disrespectfully at all Dak, but didnt I already give evidence?.. Swansont, yes my statement about no "scientifical" proof was stupid, and Hellbender, I am saying that my going to a christian school didn't have anything to do with me being a creationist, It just educated me more on my already aquired belief in God. fuhrerkeebs, I do know that people die, that, along with wars and famines, was all accounted for in that statement about the population I had made. In My Memory, wow, willowtree is a bit embarrasing to me, and pretty much all Christians, but I guess his pyramid thing made a little sense.

[Dak]

I dont mean this disrespectfully at all Dak, but didnt I already give evidence?..

no disrespect taken. and no, you havent provided evidence. you have provided reasoning, but have not backed your reasoning up with evidence.

 

basically, what i mean is that you have based your arguments on certain assumptions which are not shared by the scientifical community (such as the assumption that the rate of population growth has been constant throughought history), and so for us to accept them you must provide evidence that the assumptions are true (likewize, if we use any assumptions that you do not agree with, simply ask us for evidence and we shal provide it)

 

i sujjest you following swansonts advice and pick one or two of your arguments against evolution, explain them clearly to us and provide as much evidence as you feel nessesary. then we can discuss the merits/flaws of your arguments.

[Hellbender]

I dont mean this disrespectfully at all Dak, but didnt I already give evidence?.. Swansont, yes my statement about no "scientifical" proof was stupid,

Simply repeating yourself doesn't constitute evidence in my book. The statement about "scientifical proof" was stupid, not just for the reason that "scientifical" is not a term, but also you are a creationist saying that evolution has no evidence.

and Hellbender, I am saying that my going to a christian school didn't have anything to do with me being a creationist, It just educated me more on my already aquired belief in God.

Riiight. Doesn't it strike you as odd that creationism would be the only scientific theory (provided it even qualifies as such) that requires belief in the christian god and bible?

fuhrerkeebs, I do know that people die, that, along with wars and famines, was all accounted for in that statement about the population I had made.

I don't think it was. And you even failed to address Dak and I's point that the world's human populations aren't, and never have been, in some state of stasis that would be required for your extrapolations to have any validity. There are lots of population limiting factors. Have you ever heard of a fun little thing called the "black plague", for example? You know, wiped most of Europe's population a while ago?

In My Memory, wow, willowtree is a bit embarrasing to me, and pretty much all Christians, but I guess his pyramid thing made a little sense.

Willow is an embarassment to anyone who is a member of an online message board. Maybe its just me, but the pyramid argument made no sense. Besides that, Memory pretty much refuted that whole farce in 2 posts. Its silly that willowtree isn't content to just have faith in his religion; he has to resort to numerology b.s. to try and support it

[juslikecandi]

Hellbender, I know my statement was stupid, and I didnt mean just because it used the "word" scientifical

[Dak]

back on topic, would you like to discuss any of your arguments against evolution?

[Hellbender]

Hellbender, I know my statement was stupid, and I didnt mean just because it used the "word" scientifical

I agree. I never tried to imply that the statement was fallacious only becuase of your choice of words. However, evolution is the accepted scientific explanation, so saying it has to real evidence is the truly fallacious part of your statement.

 

Anyways, if this discussion is going to continue, I would like to ask you a few questions first;

 

Is there any evidence that will change your position?

 

If we suppose evolution is so fatally flawed, or has no evidence to support it, then why do scientists continue putting so much time, energy and money into the theory? Shouldn't the scientific community have learned long ago that it is bunk and scrapped it?

 

On a similar note, how do you explain other unrelated branches of science, such as geology, that independantly have provided support for many aspects of evolution theory?

 

If evolution and an old earth is somehow falsified, in what way does this automatically make biblical creationism the only other viable explanation?

[insane_alien]

I believe in a God/higher being/alien super-race/whatever maybe even one that created the universe. My difference to religous nuts is that i also believe in science. I believe that physics is the rules that allowed whatever caused the big bang to determine the future of the universe if it was ever designed at all. I keep an open mind and change my veiws based on evidence.

Anyway to my point... I heard a nice little statement that brings together creationism and science quite nicely.

Forgive my lack of all the seven days or the order but it's been a while.

"let there be light : Big Bang,

seperate the light from the dark: cooling of the universe and formation of suns

the land thingy: the formation of the planets

the plants: evolved out of microbes

the animals: evolved out of same microbes just took longer

the humans: evolved out of animals that evolved out of microbes"

 

its not exact but its the best i can do from memory. I believe in evolution as i have seen evidence for it. Think of the human genome. We see loads of "junk" DNA from species we evolved out of. Due to this we share DNA from several million species of insect a few thousand mammals a few hundered trees(includes all vegetation) some fish a few hundered thousand microbes and bit of everything else. So i think this stands that we evolved out of the same primordial gunge although look at some poor excuses of human beings (people like hovind) makes me wonder if they are a seperate species evolved from BS. lol

[juslikecandi]

I think it was Dak who said all my arguments were just reasoning. But isnt the theory of evolution the same thing? Reasoning? What makes evolutionists' reasoning better than creationists' reasoning?

[PhDP]

The modern theory of evolution has predictive and descriptive power, it's science. Creationism is based on religion, on faith.

[Dak]

I think it was Dak who said all my arguments were just reasoning. But isnt the theory of evolution the same thing? Reasoning? What makes evolutionists' reasoning better than creationists' reasoning?

i believe that i said that your arguments were bad reasoning... and as phil said, science is testable.

 

the offer is still there to discuss your ideas in more depth, or any aspects/assumptions of evolutionary theory if youd like, but i sujjest that we take it one or two ideas at a time, so that we can properly disect and discuss them.

[swansont]

I think it was Dak who said all my arguments were just reasoning. But isnt the theory of evolution the same thing? Reasoning? What makes evolutionists' reasoning better than creationists' reasoning?

 

Good reasoning vs. bad reasoning. Creationists' arguments are generally fraught with incorrect facts, strawmen and any number of logical fallacies. They haven't cornered the market on intellectual dishonesty, but it's not for lack of trying.

 

Lest you think that's an ad hominem, let's take an argument you've put forth, in post 27 - population. You assumed that the present rate of change occurred for a much longer period of time, and came up with a very small population at the time of the flood. The problem is that we have census records that prove that the population increases of the last century were not present over the previous 4000 years. The argument is an extrapolation to get a particular answer. That's the antithesis of science.

 

Similar error in the moon orbit argument. The rate of recession depends on the strength of tidal coupling, which, in turn, depends on the location of the oceans and continents. It's not a constant, so you can't extrapolate linearly.

 

All of the young-earth creation arguments are similarly fatally flawed. (If I were a creationist, proving two to be wrong would mean that I could extrapolate and conclude that they are all wrong, but I'm not so I won't. Each can be destroyed using actual evidence)

[Hellbender]

I think it was Dak who said all my arguments were just reasoning. But isnt the theory of evolution the same thing? Reasoning? What makes evolutionists' reasoning better than creationists' reasoning?

I think that your arguments are copy and pastes from ICR or something, not reasoning. Scientific theories such as evolution or big-bang are formulated by much more than simple reasoning, a lot of testing and logic goes into them. This is where it differs from creationism.

[HonorableOne]

I'm back............

 

So what do you think when you dream about a place

you have never seen or been to in your life when your awake? Do

you think you have a great imagination and that place doesn't exist?

You think you just build brand new sceneries out of your imagination?

You're wrong if you do. Every dream is a telepathic reception and

mixture of other people, animals and even bugs visual memories. Your

dream scenes are 'built' potentially out of many telepathic memories

received while your brain is in an open state of mind letting of the

anxiety, tension and stress of the previous day. To people who do not

believe this is true, all I can ask is how imaginative is your life

wearing the same types of clothes every day, doing the same old routines,

stuck in a rut that never seems to give you time to do fun creative

stuff like you did when you were a child? It makes no sense to believe

you have one iota of imagination in a dream state when you show none in

an awake state. People are recognized for who they are by their works

and know themselves by their accomplishments. Who cares if it's evolution

or religeon?

I would not suggest anyone try to transendentally mediatate to

receive telepathic sentences. Apparently after I did so for 30+ years

and basically dreamt awake, I was listening many times to sudden

sentences and words while I was awake. After that I gave thought to

those words. I'd rather see pictures in a dream asleep so to speak. Also a

ole fashioned feeling is enough telepathic reception for me unless it's

one of the scum sucking aquatic dinosaurs tha I had in my aquarium 40

years ago and I feel a sudden urge to bottom feed.

The situation is my memory has taken a vacation. Also

there is a strange kind of word dylexia happening where I call my cats

dogs and my dogs cats. I also call my male dogs females and my female

dogs males. The situation is getting better the longer I don't meditate.

At present I still have a hard time remembering real peoples' names

because the visions wouldn't tell me theirs when I asked. They just said

'go home.'

Most people who meditate try to reach an emotional level of bliss.

I reached an emotional level of bliss, then proceeded to have numerous

times I conversed with thinking in language or sent a healing type of Reiki

energy to those who told me of their life problems after I asked what

was wrong. Usually it was a family problem the wife was having with the

concept she had low self-esteem the older she got in spite of having a

history of great accomplishments like providing love for a family. Why

me?

However, it is not my job or pleasure to help ladies subconsciuosly

with something the male partner should be doing. Furthermore, my memory

is important to me as I sort through thousands of transendental

telepathic occurences and try to put them in a way that makes sense to

the scientific community which seems to have no place to even start

coming up with the right scientific experiments to test telepathic ability.

I find a huge variance in different peoples' abilities and even my dogs.

Telepathic ability, sending or receiving, seems to be greater in females

in general, this is also true for my dogs. I am male. My ability was not

acheived early in life, it was a self taught method that involved 3

decades as I have previously mentioned.

Personally I can totally relate to chat about God being a turnoff.

For that reason I don't go to church with my paents or anybody else on

Sundays. Why bother getting turned off when it is probably the only time

you socialize with people all week long other than a work setting?

Besides I heard God say, I Love You. It came through a glowing dove soaring

across a lake where I was camping early one morning after I got up to go

to the latrine.

What do I need to go to church for anyways? For someone to tell me

what God meant when people heard words 2000 years or more ago? How hard

is it to figure out the words I Love You? Not very. To chew the fat and

tap at you a while longer for the sake of your distraction or entertainment,

I also had full blown conersations with an energy entity who took every

opportunity to hint at the fact he was the devil. Saw him too. In my

living room. In a chromed cage. He was smiling and looked like he

belonged in the Holywood Wax Museum.

May have been a discontinued devil model. He also wanted me to

play games with him. One of the games, I didn't care for was remember

the hallucinations in the right order and repeat them back to win a

prize. It has been scientifically proven that most people do not

remember more than 11 different occurences. The low end is 7 items.

Visions may be even less. After about 5-6 I had a hard time remebering

if the chimpanzee had his arm around the picture of Raquel Welch first,

or was it Elizabeth Taylors' picture of her in Cleopatra. Also after

that seeing little 3 inch 3D black monkies standing on my desk in various

places, I had a hard time remembering if the monkey on my left was waving

at me before the one on the right showed up.

The nature of these visions also was when I looked back to see if they

were still there, they were. Including the chimps in the photos and they

moved around the stars. So I think you can relate how difficult it is

to remember to win the prize which I chose to be healing anybody without

them knowing it. If I did win the prize I'm healing them without me knowing

it too. I'd rather wake up with my tongue in lemon yogurt, I mean there is no

reward wihtout happy.

What a minute, hadn't thought about that, telepathic monkies.

Of course, I was seeing monkies and chimps because I received visions

primates have, maybe years before. So the question is, if someone has enough

ability to send their telepathic feelings, thoughts or mental images,

how hard is to send someone elses feelings, thoughts or visions? Not to

difficult I should say.

All you have to do if you receive someones sentences in church is

memorize them, and send them off to someone sitting closer. Let that

person turn to the face of the sender. Better yet, if there is someone sitting

right next to that person that loves his or her old wizened personage,

let that persond deal with the braintonic blast of serendipity most

others are chagrined by.

Anyways, next step for me is to research the internet and try to

find information on why a magnet at certain parts of head make me feel

goofy. I don't suppose any out there in science forumville have a weblink?

Actually it only worked part of the time, seems my brain changes its mind

as much as people are changing the rut there in.

I'm sure there is a chemical in the mind that causes changes the

emotions, like a catalyst, that's why I'm here amongst the neuro

scientists of the future. I want the chemical formula to changing

everyones belief at once about believing in telepathy so I don't have

to continue writing letters.

My detractors out there would simply say 'send a telepathic command

to their molecules to have them change into the chemical you want.' Why

bother messing with the conscious convictions of belief. This is why

telepathy is not taken seriously, it is not rooted in chemistry. How

many people received a course in high school in telepathy along with

their chemistry class? You simply cannot teach something that people

don't think exists.

How many religeous zealots burned women as withces at the stake for

using the healing power of herbs and plants. It was a while before

people even realized various chemicals make up everything. During that

time some sat around entire lives in monastaries and sought to chat

with God or even say they heard a few words. The words "I Love You'

from God I heard weren't only to me, they were to the whole world of

people.

You can go to church to hear what God supposedly said centuries ago

or even now. But if you hear someone else instead and look over at that

person, just think of him or her as having their own thoughts and feeling

one with God. That deserves a scoop of vanilla ice cream because hey....

ya know ya got it going on, when ya can believe someone else is one with God

other than you.

As far as pseudoscience debunker specialists, what about all the

evidence that twins separated for years have the same habits, traits,

characteristics and behavior, wear the same amount of rings on their fingers,

both have the same size families and etc? In my observations in this

tourist area which grows in population hugely in the summer I frequently

see people who look a lot like the locals. Interestingly enough they have

the same body movements and gestures, same attitudes and who knows, maybe

even the same low scientific IQ. (from lack of observational and listening

skills) (( but maybe their both good at crossword puzzles)).....

Anyways, my question is do you think people with the same face are molded

into who they are by society (religeous way of looking at it) or do you think

that when they look at themselves in the mirror they comparing notes

telepathically without knowing it (evolutionary way of looking at it)?

Personally I think the scientists opinion that 5 million unused

braincells have no ability is wrong. It's like 5 million people living

in a city all thinking together on a telepathic wavelenght getting up the

umphhhh to sent off brainwaves. Meanwhile back at the ranch, your conscious

mind the other neurons (the ones used) are like country folk on the phone

to each other. I'd say why the heck would a bunch of city folk even

bother letting a few country folk they exist. Same with your supposedly

unused braincells doing the much more important work of sending off

signals telepathically without you knowing it and getting in touch

with the rest of the world. Yes we are still at the lowest stage of

the telepathic "food for thought chain" compared to other civilizations

in the universes.

I have yet to connect to a cavemans memory energy bundle floating

like a cloud of fine black particles around this moist environ. Maybe

it might not be a good idea, I might drag some luscious babe by her hair

off into the bushes for a fun time. Come to think of it that might be

a good defense in court for a rapist. Maybe it is better not to come

up with hypothesis testing methods for proving the existence of telepathy,

to many rapists would claim caveman possession. Have no fear though, I

for one am well aware of sudden changes in telepathic possessions and if

anyone can handle a sudden surge of being possessed by anything from

the mentality of a pylori bacteria telepathic cloud to the invasion of

my mind from Sigmund Freud, I can. I know where ground zero is and this

letter proves I am not crazy. If I do feel crazy, it's only a temporary

telepathic connection, you should consider the same philosopy until

science embraces some concept of thinking beyond conscious thinking.

This brings me back to my search for links to scientific studies

that go indepth about the chemical and electromagnetic functions of the

brain. Anyone have any?

Talked to another person yesterday that told me she feels things when one

of her kids is having problems. Another lady told me about a grandmother who

was in a nursing home who didn't even talk feeling the vibration of her grandson having his handcuffs put on to tight and hurting his wrists. She

blurted out some sentence about it before anyone even knew what happened.

This is the kind of thing I want to see in the posts. But hey whatever turns

you on.Belief in the words of thousands, nay, millions of people about their

telepathic experiences may not be scientific proof enough for scientists

to use deductive reasoning, but at least belief it's pseudo science is

one step closer to being a science than the ancients who saw a face and

carved one of the alledged 2500 idol gods of the world. But then maybe

God made telepathy also, so you could hear the words "I Love You".

On the scientific side maybe the scientists don't want to prove telepathy.

I mean afterall they did spend a lot of time and money going ot school

for an education. If all that information was accessed at home in the

comfort and luxery of your abode, who the heck is going to make the

effort to go to college, unless its to look for a breeding partner?

Also who is going to buy any books or have any curious feelings about

asking questions of others? IN theory, if evolution prevails on telepathic

abilities coming into the consciousness of your brain, your mouth will

get small, your eyes and head big, your body thin (because your happy all

the time and don't eat) and you'll basically look like ET in Spielbergs

movie ET. Hair is grown because you have memory problems, you won't have

memory problems cause you can access whatever you need to know as long

as you can remember to ask the question. So you may have some "memory"

hair in places like under your arms and other places where curiousity

recognition patterns are related to smell identification. In general,

be prepared for a slow morphing of the human shape after conscious and

5 to 500 million unused braincells join. I should take about 500,000 years

to change physically. Yes I do believe people who look the same have the

same mentality, maybe if we all looked exactly the same, we'd all have

the same preferences, etc., but that is a subject that is going to be

pushed to the back burner because some people would argue that people

with the same preferences now don't look the same. Yes, true, but most

prefer sexual contact with another human than a large 6 foot tall spider.

Although I did have an affair with at least one I know of in a dream.

Actually it had a crush on me. I have to get off the web now, read ya

later.

[the tree]

So what do you think when you dream about a place

you have never seen or been to in your life when your awake? Do

you think you have a great imagination and that place doesn't exist?

You think you just build brand new sceneries out of your imagination?

There's plenty of factors that could comprise place in my dreams' date=' it could be a mixture of places that I have been, of places that have been described to me or that I've seen a picture of. Of course there are random factors involved to although it's indeterminable how much influence that has. I wouldn't be suprised if the shape of the creases on my pillow had a pretty major influence as well as the movement and temperature of the air in my room.

You're wrong if you do. Every dream is a telepathic reception and mixture of other people, animals and even bugs visual memories. Your dream scenes are 'built' potentially out of many telepathic memories received while your brain is in an open state of mind letting of the anxiety, tension and stress of the previous day.

Of course, so how do these get into our brains whilst never being picked up by any form of scientific monitoring equiptment?

What was the evolutionary benifit of exerting energy to output a signal that's only picked up whilst people are asleep?

To people who do not believe this is true, all I can ask is how imaginative is your life wearing the same types of clothes every day, doing the same old routines, stuck in a rut that never seems to give you time to do fun creative stuff like you did when you were a child?

I'm not stuck in a rut, I just finished my exams and I don't always where the same clothes, I don't know what I'll wear tomorrow but maybe I'll wear my tie as a belt and maybe I'll straighten my hair who knows? Either way it'd be influenced by external factors that I am fully aware of.

Just because you have a crap and boring life doesn't mean that everyone else does.

It makes no sense to believe you have one iota of imagination in a dream state when you show none in an awake state.

Hey! Screw you, my English an Theatre teachers say that I have a good imagination and they have qualifications.

People are recognized for who they are by their works and know themselves by their accomplishments. Who cares if it's evolution or religeon?

Well duh' date=' so tell me, what achivements have you made? Any degrees? When was your last promotion? When did you last get laid?

I would not suggest anyone try to transendentally mediatate to receive telepathic sentences. Apparently after I did so for 30+ years and basically dreamt awake, I was listening many times to sudden sentences and words while I was awake. After that I gave thought to those words. I'd rather see pictures in a dream asleep so to speak.

If you continue looking for things that aren't there then you will start to see them, kind of like looking at a telivision screen when your tuned between channels, or shapes in clouds. It can be fun sometimes but if you actually take it seriously then you're just being stupid.

Also a ole fashioned feeling is enough telepathic reception for me unless it's one of the scum sucking aquatic dinosaurs tha I had in my aquarium 40 years ago and I feel a sudden urge to bottom feed.

Do you? If so' date=' then you are crazy, even if it was accountable to theese ridiclious concepts of telapathy that your so keen on then your still way to impresionable.

The situation is my memory has taken a vacation. Also there is a strange kind of word dylexia happening where....

Dyslexia, note the lex, as in lexus as in word. Don't make up your own jargon. You're not even well-worded enough to pretend to be clever.

The situation is getting better the longer I don't meditate.

At present I still have a hard time remembering real peoples' names

because the visions wouldn't tell me theirs when I asked. They just said

'go home.'

They are saying go home because they don't like you. Besides' date=' asking hallucinations for infomation is like asking a desert for cream soda.

<snip>bollocks about meditation</snip>Usually it was a family problem the wife was having with the concept she had low self-esteem the older she got in spite of having a history of great accomplishments like providing love for a family. Why

me?

However, it is not my job or pleasure to help ladies subconsciuosly

with something the male partner should be doing.

So because you can't get the attention of real chicks your trying to help out imaginary ones? That's freaking hilarious! Even better is that your so unused to getting anywhere, you are only capable of lending a temporary hand to these girls. That has got to be one of the funniest things ever.

Furthermore, my memory is important to me as I sort through thousands of transendental telepathic occurences and try to put them in a way that makes sense to the scientific community which seems to have no place to even start coming up with the right scientific experiments to test telepathic ability.

The reason they do not come up with experiments is because there is nothing to experiment on. There are no right experiments, becuase you are talking tottall bull.

Scientists mesure pretty much everything that does exist. Even if it can't be mesured directly.

There's things we never see that get mesured, like that 1% of the static on your telly that is an echo of the big bang? You should enjoy that because it's real unlike the things that you can't see because it's not there.

I find a huge variance in different peoples' abilities and even my dogs. Telepathic ability, sending or receiving, seems to be greater in females in general, this is also true for my dogs. I am male.

Do you actually talk to people apart from your dogs? How can you make a mesurement when no-one would admit to this rubbish?

My ability was not acheived early in life' date=' it was a self taught method that involved 3 decades as I have previously mentioned.[/quote']When you say self taught do you mean self concived? It sounds like it to me.

Personally I can totally relate to chat about God being a turnoff.

For that reason I don't go to church with my paents or anybody else on

Sundays. Why bother getting turned off when it is probably the only time

you socialize with people all week long other than a work setting?

Well I've never had the temptation to get randy in the pulpits but maybe that's because I am capable of sustaining a social life. If you find your church boring then that's not because of your ineffible wisdom' date=' you don't have any.

Besides I heard God say, I Love You. It came through a glowing dove soaring

across a lake where I was camping early one morning after I got up to go

to the latrine.

What do I need to go to church for anyways? For someone to tell me

what God meant when people heard words 2000 years or more ago? How hard

is it to figure out the words I Love You? Not very.

It seems you have a pretty fundamental misunderstanding of why churches exist, being loved isn't enough to run a peaceful and pleasant society. People look to churches for ethical guidance from what people with genuine intelligence (i.e. not you) have been thinking and writing about for a lot more than 2000 years.

To chew the fat and tap at you a while longer for the sake of your distraction or entertainment, I also had full blown conersations with an energy entity who took every opportunity to hint at the fact he was the devil.

I'm the devil, I'm the devil I AM THE FREAKING DEVIL GODAMMIT!!!!

Saw him too. In my living room. In a chromed cage. He was smiling and looked like he belonged in the Holywood Wax Museum.

You know, there is a reason why it's recomended not to take recreational drugs whilst on your own.

...It has been scientifically proven that most people do not

remember more than 11 different occurences...

Please don't talk about science' date=' you clearly know nothing about it and the mockery that you make of it can be taken very offensively.

Anyways, next step for me is to research the internet and try to find information on why a magnet at certain parts of head make me feel goofy. I don't suppose any out there in science forumville have a weblink?

Actually it only worked part of the time, seems my brain changes its mind

as much as people are changing the rut there in.

I'm sure there is a chemical in the mind that causes changes the

emotions, like a catalyst, that's why I'm here amongst the neuro

scientists of the future. I want the chemical formula to changing

everyones belief at once about believing in telepathy so I don't have

to continue writing letters.

My God, you even suck at paradorical science.

My detractors out there would simply say 'send a telepathic command

to their molecules to have them change into the chemical you want.' Why

bother messing with the conscious convictions of belief. This is why

telepathy is not taken seriously' date=' it is not rooted in chemistry. How

many people received a course in high school in telepathy along with

their chemistry class? You simply cannot teach something that people

don't think exists.[/quote']If I were a parent, I would be outraged if I heard my childs time was wasted like that and I wouldn't hesistate to change thier school. That is why it's not taught.

As far as pseudoscience debunker specialists' date=' what about all the evidence that twins separated for years have the same habits, traits, characteristics and behavior, wear the same amount of rings on their fingers, both have the same size families and etc? In my observations in this

tourist area which grows in population hugely in the summer I frequently

see people who look a lot like the locals. Interestingly enough they have

the same body movements and gestures, same attitudes and who knows, maybe even the same low scientific IQ. (from lack of observational and listening skills) (( but maybe their both good at crossword puzzles)).....[/quote']Well there's three letters that can explain that, ones a D the others an N and the last ones an A, they come in the order that I stated them.

 

Anyways, my question is do you think people with the same face are molded into who they are by society (religeous way of looking at it) or do you think that when they look at themselves in the mirror they comparing notes telepathically without knowing it (evolutionary way of looking at it)?

No, I don't think either. I haven't observed any social classes sharing facial features as thier common factors.

 

Personally I think the scientists opinion that 5 million unused braincells have no ability is wrong.

Another thing that you tottally misunderstand, all the neurons in the brain get used. It's just that a low proporotion get used at the same moment because the brain simply does not have the resources to take that, it might even overheat.

This brings me back to my search for links to scientific studies that go indepth about the chemical and electromagnetic functions of the brain. Anyone have any?

There's plenty but judging by the intellectual ability that you've shown so far' date=' you should probably start with "The amazing brain", published by DK, I forget the name of the author as I read it when I was 8.

Actually it had a crush on me.

You are an idiot.

I have to get off the web now' date=' read ya

later.[/quote']I must admit that talking to you is rather fun, not because your ideas are interesting but more because your sheer lack of understanding about the most basic of concepts amusses me so.

[HonorableOne]

Oh and thanks a million for the short responses to my original post.

There were some rib ticklers in there that made me laugh hard as soon

as I read them. I think the real laugh is on scientists though. I mean

how can you ignore researching a scientific explanation for so many

people that connect without ever seeing or talking (writing) to each

other? And yes I do believe that telepathy is under the right heading,

this one, neural science rather than psychiatry/psychology which is

a study of behavior. Last time I knew my neural brain controlled my behavior,

twitch.......twitch........twitch.......

Pseudo science for all quack busters is like astrology where

one twelfth of the population has the same horoscope for a day. Nice try

though.

And a special note of thanks to the "Tree" for the negative reaction. It used to be

that people who heard the truths of telepathy (ewwwwww a catchy title for my book)

from me got instantly sick and tryed to take over the conversation by changing hte subject and ignoring mine, another typical reaction is someone who makes a fuss and crys like a little kid throwing a temper tantrum, (older kids call themselves the devil).

Us mature adults just say, well he has the devil in him, meaning of course he is telepathically connected to about every low life, swindling, attention deprived, lying, cheating, theiving, Possibly cat kicking, dog torturing, child hating, goverment backbiter that is living and ever has lived. The reaction is so common now at a distance on the web on various forums, I really wonder what these people look like,

I have never met a person face to face that trys so hard to degrade someone as these

people like "Tree". Nor do I want to, no need to, they have a problem debating anything with the opposite statement , "there is no such thing as telepathy." That's alright, prove it.

 

I'm glad that your not soluble

That would be quite bad

I'm glad that your not soluble

'cos that would make you sad

I'm glad your not soluable tree face,

cuz I'd rather burn you in the fireplace.

[swansont]

I'm back............

 

 

What, pray tell, does any of this have to do with the topic at hand?

[Dave]

This thread takes the biscuit, even for the Pseudoscience forum. Thread closed.