Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Is it possible to efficiantly produce energy from the acceleration and heat produced by fast moving atoms/atom particles?

 

How could we capture any energy produced by the plasma?

Posted

Useless....... unless of course you reach the critical temperature in hydrogen gas where fusion becomes self-sustaining. This is how fusion power plants will work in a few decades.

Posted

And here was me thinking they were going to use methods like 'increasing the pressume' or Muon catalysis to help with the fusion.

 

No, they're just going to get it REALLY HOT.

Posted
Originally posted by fafalone

and here was me thinking "plasmas" implied those things

 

Well, for a start, plasmas don't have to be hot, afaik.

Posted
Originally posted by fafalone

Well when you achieve cold fusion, let me know :P

 

You said that fusion had to be hot because it was a plasma.

 

Plasma != Hot

Posted

Oh, fusion would in theory then, be 100 times as efficiant. Is it possible to disconnect water particles into its components of H and O, and simply use that as a fuel to power a bigass turbine??

Posted

I don't know about "efficient" but the fuel would be more readily available, and not nearly as dangerous, same for the byproducts. the radioactive waste from a fusion plant would only be low level.

 

as for splitting water.... essentially this is how hydrogen powered cars work, although again it would be impractical as a power station because you would have to expend more energy splitting the water than you got from burning it again, so it would be pointless. Some people think that sonoluminesence may be the key, as that creates little bubbles with sound. I doubt it personally though.

Posted

I remember seeing a show on Discovery chaqnnel about how they can make rocket fuel from the hydrogen of the disconnected water particles and the oxygen working as, well...an oxident. Just like saltpeter in gunpowder.

 

I wonder though, if the butning hydrogen would be efficient enough to propel a turbine, or power an engine. This is because hydrogen is naturally a gas, and I have doubts that it would expand enough, when it explodes to do such things.

 

 

I'm noty talking about splitting water, that only creates an electrical charge. I'm talking about burning the split water.

Posted

oh it would make excellent turbine fuel, though as I said, it would end up being inefficient, as you would have to get hold of hydrogen in the first place, and the only way to do that is through electrolysis of water. Hydrogen powered cars will work on exactly this principle.

Posted

Press Release 04/21/03

 

Genesis World Energy Introduces Revolutionary Automotive Hydrogen Fuel Generation Device

 

Genesis HICEF™ Technology leapfrogs current fuel cell-based transportation development by enabling the use of hydrogen in internal combustion engines

 

Boise, ID - April 21, 2003 - Genesis World Energy, the company behind a revolutionary energy generation technology introduced in December 2002, has announced an automotive and transportation application that creates an on-demand source of hydrogen fuel for internal combustion engines. The Genesis HICEF (Hydrogen Internal Combustion Engine Fuel) Technology represents a stunning breakthrough in hydrogen-based automotive power systems through its on-board, on-demand generation of hydrogen gas derived from water — circumventing the need for either externally supplied sources of hydrogen or hydrogen generation based on chemicals or fossil fuel derivatives.

 

The Genesis HICEF Technology represents a dramatic departure from current hydrogen-based fuel cell research, which has focused primarily on the generation of power for electric vehicles. Rather than abandoning the internal combustion engine and the decades of progress made in its improvement, the Genesis technology will enable automobile makers to design power systems that run off hydrogen gas rather than fossil fuels - thus eliminating a major source of pollution.

 

For a 60-day period effective May 1- June 30, 2003, World Energy Management, the licensing arm of Genesis World Energy, will make its HICEF Technology available to companies who are interested in applying it to automobile, trucking, mass transit, aircraft, locomotive and marine engines. The HICEF device can be easily incorporated into existing internal combustion engines with relatively few modifications made to the vehicle, and is similar in approach to today's conversion of vehicles from gasoline to natural gas or propane — without the need for high-pressure storage of flammable gases.

 

On Demand Hydrogen Fuel

Although manufacturers have demonstrated both internal combustion engine and fuel cell-powered automobiles using hydrogen, the technologies upon which they have been based have not been commercially viable. The Genesis HICEF Technology overcomes a critical barrier that has inhibited the use of hydrogen as an internal combustion engine fuel source: the cost-effective creation and delivery of hydrogen gas. Relying on nothing more than a source of purified water, the Genesis HICEF Technology makes it possible to design internal combustion-powered vehicles that burn hydrogen gas produced on board the vehicle, freeing it from the need for externally generated sources of hydrogen fuel.

 

The Genesis gCell Technology

The Genesis HICEF is based on a revolutionary technology recently introduced by the Genesis Project in the form of the Edison Device - a residential and commercial energy generation unit that creates gas and electrical power through the separation of hydrogen and oxygen molecules contained in any source of water. At the core of this technology are the Genesis gCells, which break water down into its basic molecular structure through a series of electro-chemical processes, yielding ultra-pure hydrogen and oxygen gases. The reactant chemistry in the Genesis HICEF Technology is different from that of the Edison Device in that the gCells do not require many of the support processes needed in the Edison technology. The water supplying the gCells can be stored in special tanks that replace the ones currently used for gasoline in conventional fossil-fuel vehicles.

 

Economic and Environmental Impact

Since the water used by the gCells must be purified, consumers will have the choice of obtaining purified water from conventional fueling stations for an estimated $.20 to $.30 per gallon, or relying on filters in the Genesis HICEF unit that purify the water from sources such as a garden hose. Obtaining already purified water from fueling stations will extend the life of the filters in the HICEF unit, as well as provide a more profitable income source to gas station owners.

 

Converting diesel engines will require a more involved process than gasoline engines; however the cost will be relatively the same as the conversion to natural gas. The trucking industry and mass transit will benefit greatly from the reduction in fuel costs. Of even greater significance are the potential benefits to our environment: the Genesis HICEF Technology represents the cleanest possible alternative fuel source, producing essentially zero tailpipe emissions.

 

Readily Available Technology

Manufacturers and aftermarket companies who are interested in the conversion of conventional internal combustion vehicles from fossil fuels or natural gas energy sources may express their interest in utilizing the Genesis HICEF Technology through a form available on the World Energy Management website. This form will be available through June 30, 2003 at http://www.worldenergymanagement.com.

 

For further information regarding the Genesis Project, the Edison Device, and World Energy Management, please visit http://www.genesisworldenergy.org.

 

Scott

Posted

Well, I've never heard of it, and it sounds from that like a perpetual motion device.

 

It should be illegal to break the second law of thermodynamics, then we wouldn't have this problem.

Posted
Originally posted by fafalone

That's not what I was talking about. This conversation was about fusion.

 

And you justified that fusion was hot because it was a plasma.

 

And then you justified that the plasma was hot because it was used in fusion.

 

Nice cyclic operator you've got there, I've got to get me some of that!

Posted
Originally posted by MrL_JaKiri

Well, I've never heard of it, and it sounds from that like a perpetual motion device.

 

It should be illegal to break the second law of thermodynamics, then we wouldn't have this problem.

  • 3 months later...
Posted

No.

 

That would be like scraping butter off a piece of toast and spreading it on another piece.

 

You get more toast out of it, but each piece has less butter than the original.

 

We can't operate outside the laws of thermodynamics (or butter dynamics if you don't wish to mix metaphors).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.