akcapr Posted April 16, 2005 Posted April 16, 2005 probably the only place youd make some gold compounds is like inside a volcano or sometin
akcapr Posted April 16, 2005 Posted April 16, 2005 again' date=' the new york state regents is messed up. btw, define "laboratory conditions"[/quote'] isnt there just a universal reagent table? does each state have its own? I always though there was only one.
budullewraagh Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 new york is one of the few states that actually have regents exams. the regents are state-specific. "probably the only place youd make some gold compounds is like inside a volcano or sometin" or in some nitrosyl chloride...
Tetrahedrite Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 For everyone's information....... Although gold is most commonly found as pure gold (and Au-Ag alloys), other gold minerals aren't all that uncommon in high temperature mineral deposits. Au commonly forms compounds with tellurium, selenium, even sulfur and antimony. Au-chloride complexes are extremely common in nature and are important in enrichment processes. Some bacteria are even known to metabolise gold as a part of their energy cycles!! So the laboratory isn't the only place Au compounds exist.
Skye Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 Is the gold in water (river or seawater) usually in forms such as halides or sulphides?
Tetrahedrite Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 Is the gold in water (river or seawater) usually in forms such as halides or sulphides? Are you refering to "dissolved" gold, or gold in the sediments?
akcapr Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 new york is one of the few states that actually have regents exams. the regents are state-specific. "probably the only place youd make some gold compounds is like inside a volcano or sometin" or in some nitrosyl chloride... i meant in nature
YT2095 Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 Gold is less reactive than Silver. no debate to be had, move along!
mmalluck Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 Mercery will dissolve gold as well. Miners used this to leech gold out of rocks. Then they'd boil off the mercery.
jdurg Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 Mercery will dissolve gold as well. Miners used this to leech gold out of rocks. Then they'd boil off the mercery. Mercury doesn't change the gold in any way, shape, or form. If it did, then simply boiling off the mercury would not leave you with gold. Saying that mercury chemically dissolves gold is like saying that water chemically dissolves salt. It doesn't. It's a physical change and not a chemical one. What the miners did was rely on a physical property of gold and mercury. Gold will easily amalgamate with mercury while many of the impurities will not. As a result, it's a way to physically purify the gold. Once it has been amalgamated, they simply heat the 'solution' and drive off the mercury much like one would drive off the water in a water solution of something. When aqua regia is used, however, it chemically changes the gold. It turns the gold into a soluble ion. Just evaporating off all the water/acid won't leave you with pure gold. You need further chemical refining. Therefore, it's a chemical dissolution and not a physical one.
mmalluck Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 Yeah, I know mercury and gold don't actually bond, it's just a fun fact I thought I'd throw into the mix. Most people don't know that.
jdurg Posted April 19, 2005 Posted April 19, 2005 Heh. People wearing gold rings who work with mercury and wind up with a little spill certainly find out really quickly.
Tetrahedrite Posted April 19, 2005 Posted April 19, 2005 Mercury doesn't change the gold in any way' date=' shape, or form. If it did, then simply boiling off the mercury would not leave you with gold. Saying that mercury chemically dissolves gold is like saying that water chemically dissolves salt. It doesn't. It's a physical change and not a chemical one.[/quote'] Newsflash, water DOES chemically dissolve (soluble) salts. The chemical bonds between the anions and cations are broken, and hexaqua ionic species are formed. A chemical equilibrium is set up between the solid and the hexaqua species. The fact that an eqilibrium exists means that it is a chemical reaction, and not simply a change in state. I think what you mean to say is that that there is no change in oxidation state ie it is still Au(0).
Tetrahedrite Posted April 19, 2005 Posted April 19, 2005 Tetrahedrite, dissolved gold. The main gold species in sea water is [AuCl4]-, in the parts per billion range.
jdurg Posted April 19, 2005 Posted April 19, 2005 That is probably a better way of putting it, but still, if you evaporate the water away you end up with the exact same thing you started with. Also, just because an equillibrium exists does not mean that it's a chemical reaction. Look at the equillibrium that exists when a substance is boiling. An equillibrium is set up between the liquid phase of the substance and the gas phase. No chemical reaction is occuring at all, but an equillibrium exists.
Tetrahedrite Posted April 20, 2005 Posted April 20, 2005 Look at the equillibrium that exists when a substance is boiling. An equillibrium is set up between the liquid phase of the substance and the gas phase. No chemical reaction is occuring at all, but an equillibrium exists. Ahh, but this is not a chemical equilibrium, it is purely physical. You cannot have a Ksp for this reaction. In catalysis, for example, you reform the catalyst at the end of the reaction. This definitely does not mean that the catalyst did not undergo any chemical reaction, and in fact we know thew opposite is true.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now