EdEarl Posted January 8, 2016 Posted January 8, 2016 Collectively Conscious A few months ago scientists from France claimed that they could create sperm in a dish. They announced that they had used biotechnology to create fully functioning semen from genetic material. The same researchers have now taken out a patent on the material, only somewhat explaining their technique. ... I wonder if their partial explanation is hiding something besides a viable biological process. Moreover, this process pushes at the edges of law and ethics. Who will be the father and who is responsible if the child has serious and expensive medical problems. What happens to the baby if the mother dies is child birth. I think I am opposed to such a patent being issueds ; although, I haven't considered the issues fully. I think this will be hotly contested, more than Monsanto's GMO program.
Strange Posted January 8, 2016 Posted January 8, 2016 If they have not fully explained the technique, then the patent will be invalid.
MigL Posted January 8, 2016 Posted January 8, 2016 You can patent the process used. I don't think you can patent sperm. I'd hate to have a patent infringement case filed against me ! 1
John Cuthber Posted January 9, 2016 Posted January 9, 2016 "French Biotech Scientists Patent Creation Of Sperm" No, they did not. Why pretend they did?
EdEarl Posted January 9, 2016 Author Posted January 9, 2016 "French Biotech Scientists Patent Creation Of Sperm" No, they did not. Why pretend they did? If they aere awarded a patent, it is probably worth money.
Endy0816 Posted January 9, 2016 Posted January 9, 2016 (edited) Realistically this would simply be an option for couples having trouble conceiving. If there's enough demand multiple avenues to the same end result will be found. Swapping out DNA in donor sperm, utilizing another cell type, injecting parental DNA directly into an egg and starting things going, etc. Need to see their results before speculating too much. I've heard of promising results in attempts to create female sperm and male eggs. This being a simpler case(male sperm from male cells) it wouldn't surprise me if they had success but would still like to see some data first. Edited January 9, 2016 by Endy0816
CharonY Posted January 9, 2016 Posted January 9, 2016 As John noted, the title is bad. Sperm is not created, but rather genetic material is transferred from not fully differentiated cells. As such fatherhood is never in question (as in typical ivf).
Elite Engineer Posted January 11, 2016 Posted January 11, 2016 You can patent the process used. I don't think you can patent sperm. I'd hate to have a patent infringement case filed against me ! I believe the Thermus aquaticus bacteria used in PCR are placed under a patent..or something similar.
StringJunky Posted January 11, 2016 Posted January 11, 2016 I believe the Thermus aquaticus bacteria used in PCR are placed under a patent..or something similar. It'll be a modification to them that's patented
CharonY Posted January 11, 2016 Posted January 11, 2016 Or more typically a vector construct containing a modified gene product.
Recommended Posts