Quantum atom generation

[sirtheory]

So by seeing the entanglement could we program a computer to pull the atom into a pool from where it was ? I understand that studying the entanglement will disentangle if. Like a spinning coin, why see if it will land on heads or tails; instead of just pooling it in and organizing it as such

[Strange]

I think you might need to provide a bit more information and context.

 

What entanglement? What computer?

 

And what do you mean by a "pool" in this context?

Edited January 28, 2016 by Strange

[sirtheory]

ok give me a second to explain. ive thought about this as a child , creating notes and such.

 

So by looking at an atom and see its entanglement and studying will dismantle the entanglement.

 

so see the entanglement, and use that entanglement as a line, with the starting atom as the anchor

 

A---------------------------------------------------------------------A^2

^Oxygen atom ^entangled line ^ N/A Atom

 

 

ofc, it will be a supercomputer with mathematics such as

but tweaked where we can use the line as a dense 1d blackhole that pulls the endpoint atom into a vacuum

 

we use the information aspect of the atom to transfer into the vacuum

.

the pools are the vacuums for the targeted areas

[swansont]

That doesn't really help. Entanglement is not a force or physical object. I don't know what you mean by an entangled line, and you can't use entanglement to make an atom into an anchor and pull another atom, and it's not a black hole. And your equation makes no sense, those states are not equal, or equivalent.

[sirtheory]

by using the m_a pull in the electrons to acquire the desired electrons to the entangled line being formed to the atom.

 

 

Transforming the Schwinger–Tomonaga equation into the language of the density matrix

or to be interactive

 

using the interactive photons to change the element composition of the field.

 

m_a as the weight liner

Edited January 28, 2016 by SirTheory

[swansont]

by using the m[/size]_a pull in the electrons to acquire the desired electrons to the entangled line being formed to the atom.

 

 

Transforming the Schwinger–Tomonaga equation into the language of the density matrix

or to be interactive

 

using the interactive photons to change the element composition of the field.

 

m_a as the weight liner

Mostly gibberish. Can't parse.

[sirtheory]

then go (input : acc) s'
else return (input : acc)
Finished n t -> put t >> return (T.take n input : acc)
{-# INLINE scan #-}

[Mordred]

then go (input : acc) s'

else return (input : acc)

Finished n t -> put t >> return (T.take n input : acc)

{-# INLINE scan #-}

Yep that clarifies things. (Note the exaggeration) Here is a suggestion try fully explaining what your getting at. Thus far everything I read is pure gibberish. Particularly with your terminology usage Edited January 28, 2016 by Mordred

[sirtheory]

its cause i have a scanner, and im trying an exp

 

3d with wave vector k and ω has a wave function

Particle in a box

Main article:

A particle is restricted to a 1D region between x = 0 and x = L; its wave function is:

To normalize the wave function we need to find the value of the arbitrary constant A; solved from

its because i want the scanner to push the electrons making the desired atom im working on these experiments :l

i believe i might be in the wrong section too

Edited January 28, 2016 by SirTheory

[Mordred]

It was moved to speculation as we're still trying to make sense of what your doing or proposing. Of which I'm still not having any luck.

[sirtheory]

Well thank you for that, I am in terms with history with what im creating to better the life of humanity in all love and firm connectivity to my community

[Mordred]

Entanglement is not a force or physical object. I don't know what you mean by an entangled line, and you can't use entanglement to make an atom into an anchor and pull another atom

[sirtheory]

i am creating a software that tells the computer how to scan a vacuum tank and with the code from the "code

"computer to find entangled electrons and change atoms into what is desired; well trying atleast

Edited January 28, 2016 by SirTheory

[Mordred]

Well thank you for that, I am in terms with history with what im creating to better the life of humanity in all love and firm connectivity to my community

That's beside the point, were trying to get you to explain what your doing or looking at so we can understand how to help you. Thus far I can't make heads or tails of your posts. (No pun intended) I also have no idea who moved the thread. However that doesn't matter

i am creating a software that tells the computer how to scan a vacuum tank and with the code from the "code

"computer to find entangled electrons and change atoms into what is desired; well trying atleast

Now we're getting somewhere thanks for explaining your setup.

[sirtheory]

lol sorry that came right after i sent that hahaha! well yea

Edited January 28, 2016 by SirTheory

[Strange]

I can't see any point in keeping this thread open.

 

Formal thought disorder

[sirtheory]

-.- what are you not parse about

[Mordred]

 

Let me see if I understand this correctly.

 

You have a vacuum tank, a computer and a scanner. You want to somehow use the scanner to find the entangled states, then alter the vacuum conditions using that data by altering the entangled states.

 

This description accurate?

[sirtheory]

Let me see if I understand this correctly.

 

You have a vacuum tank, a computer and a scanner. You want to somehow use the scanner to find the entangled states, then alter the vacuum conditions using that data by altering the entangled states.

 

This description accurate?

your on the right track. hold on let me elaborate

Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow.

The important thing is not to stop questioning.

 

-AE

It was moved to speculation as we're still trying to make sense of what your doing or proposing. Of which I'm still not having any luck.

wow ok, i ask for it to be moved to a more appropriate section , and its the trash. and block me of making threads.

but thank you on your view, one more reason my fire to save this earth flames passionately

[Strange]

wow ok, i ask for it to be moved to a more appropriate section , and its the trash. and block me of making threads.

 

It is not in trash, it is in speculations. And you are not blocked from making new threads (as far as I know).

[Phi for All]

i ask for it to be moved to a more appropriate section , and its the trash. and block me of making threads.

 

!

Moderator Note

Our Trashcan is not part of the Speculations forum, but the Admins had to put it somewhere. It shows up at the top when you go to Speculations, and sometimes people think their thread's been thrown away. It's just the way the software forces us to organize it.

 

Speculations (the section you're in now) is for ideas that need some mainstream support. Keep telling us more so we can understand the science involved.