Bjarne Posted January 29, 2016 Posted January 29, 2016 (edited) Which equation do I have to use to be able to calculate the total time dilation in an accelerating framework? Let say a space craft is accelerating away from usI need to calculate the time dilation for a certian period According to special relativity time dilation quadruples every time velocity doubles Edited January 29, 2016 by Bjarne
ajb Posted January 29, 2016 Posted January 29, 2016 If you are talking about just special relativity, then you can use Rindler coordinates which describe uniformly accelerating observers. From there I think you can define a notion of time dilation. I would have to check carefully.
swansont Posted January 29, 2016 Posted January 29, 2016 In SR you have to know v(t) and integrate the dilation over the time interval see http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/74683-acceleration-is-not-important-in-the-twin-paradox/page-20#entry779626That will tell you how much the proper time has changed Since accelerations are indistinguishable from gravity, you should be able to calculate it using an equivalent to the gravitational redshift if the acceleration is constant. That's what they did in the following paper MEASUREMENT OF THE RED SHIFT IN AN ACCELERATED SYSTEM USING THE MOSSBAUER EFFECT IN Fe57 H. J. Hay, J. P. Schiffer, T. E. Cranshaw, and P. A. Egelstaff The expected shift can be calculated in two ways. One can treat the acceleration as an effec- tive gravitational field and calculate the difference in potential between the source and absorber, or one can obtain the same answer using the time dilatation of special relativity Here v is constant, because it's a rotating system 1
Sensei Posted January 29, 2016 Posted January 29, 2016 According to special relativity time dilation quadruples every time velocity doubles Where did you get such idea? [math]t'=\frac{t}{\gamma}[/math] or [math]t'=t*\gamma[/math] Where [math]\gamma=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}[/math] Gamma for v=0.25c is 1.0327955589886444 Gamma for v=0.5c is 1.1547005383792517 1.1547005383792517 / 1.0327955589886445027144707732753 = 1.118033988749894848204586834366 Doesn't look like quadruple to me.. That's classical physics kinetic energy that is quadrupled when velocity is doubled. E.K.=1/2*m*v^2 for v=1,m=1,E.K.=1/2*1*1^2=0.5 J for v=2,m=1,E.K.=1/2*1*2^2=2 J (4 times as for v=1) for v=4,m=1,E.K.=1/2*1*4^2=8 J (4 times as for v=2) 1
Bjarne Posted January 30, 2016 Author Posted January 30, 2016 Where did you get such idea? [math]t'=\frac{t}{\gamma}[/math] or [math]t'=t*\gamma[/math] Where [math]\gamma=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}[/math] Gamma for v=0.25c is 1.0327955589886444 Gamma for v=0.5c is 1.1547005383792517 1.1547005383792517 / 1.0327955589886445027144707732753 = 1.118033988749894848204586834366 Doesn't look like quadruple to me.. That's classical physics kinetic energy that is quadrupled when velocity is doubled. E.K.=1/2*m*v^2 for v=1,m=1,E.K.=1/2*1*1^2=0.5 J for v=2,m=1,E.K.=1/2*1*2^2=2 J (4 times as for v=1) for v=4,m=1,E.K.=1/2*1*4^2=8 J (4 times as for v=2) Right. I mean by low speed (almost). For example: 10 000 m/s = 5,6 E-8 20 000 m/s = 2,2 E-7
imatfaal Posted February 1, 2016 Posted February 1, 2016 As Sensei pointed out you really need to consider gamma rather than gamma minus 1 which is what you are doing - but yes gamma minus 1 will quadruple when v doubles for values where v is lots lower than c. This ratio will increase as the values get closer to c and is never actually as low as 4
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now