DimaMazin Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 (edited) Can we define speed of nonsimultaneity stream so?: t'=(t-v*dx/c2)gamma vn=gamma(0 -v(v*dt))/(c2dt) vn=gamma*v2/c2 vn is speed of nonsimultaneity stream Edited January 30, 2016 by DimaMazin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 What is meant by nonsimultaneity stream? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DimaMazin Posted January 30, 2016 Author Share Posted January 30, 2016 (edited) What is meant by nonsimultaneity stream? Speed of nonsimultaneity stream is quantity of change of relativity of simultaneity with object motion per second. Nonsimultaneity stream is a change of relativity of simultaneity. Edited January 30, 2016 by DimaMazin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Speed of nonsimultaneity stream is quantity of change of relativity of simultaneity with object motion per second. Nonsimultaneity stream is a change of relativity of simultaneity. Relativity of simultaneity is a concept. An offset in simultaneity would be a time. How can it be a speed? And how can it have no units? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DimaMazin Posted January 30, 2016 Author Share Posted January 30, 2016 Relativity of simultaneity is a concept. Shouldn't we define rate of change of the concept? An offset in simultaneity would be a time. It is. How can it be a speed?It has another stream of simultaneity and is connected with speed. Nonsimultaneity is traveling at speed but has speed of own change. And how can it have no units? It has units: second of nonsimultaneity per second s'/s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 So it's not a speed. Why is it not just gamma? Your derivation makes no sense. The second equation does not follow from the first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DimaMazin Posted February 2, 2016 Author Share Posted February 2, 2016 Why is it not just gamma? Gamma is factor of simultaneity of quantities of times. My factor is factor of nonsimultaneity. Don't confuse apples with oranges. Your derivation makes no sense. The second equation does not follow from the first. I don't know what is sense for you at all. Let's consider is it correct or not: For example v=-0.866 c gamma=2 factor of nonsimultaneity=1.5 Then ,for example ,a rocket travels at v during 10second from you, it has crossed 2,596,202,686 m You need to define nonsimultaneity. I simply can solve it 10*1.5=15 s' Your solve is complex (0-(-0.866c)*2,596,202.686 / 2997924582)*2=15 s' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted February 2, 2016 Share Posted February 2, 2016 Gamma is factor of simultaneity of quantities of times. My factor is factor of nonsimultaneity. Don't confuse apples with oranges. It's inescapable. You sort of emit confusion. I don't know what is sense for you at all. Let's consider is it correct or not: For example v=-0.866 c gamma=2 factor of nonsimultaneity=1.5 Then ,for example ,a rocket travels at v during 10second from you, it has crossed 2,596,202,686 m You need to define nonsimultaneity. I simply can solve it 10*1.5=15 s' Your solve is complex (0-(-0.866c)*2,596,202.686 / 2997924582)*2=15 s' That's not the derivation, which is what I asked about (particularly how you get from t'=(t-v*dx/c2)gamma to vn=gamma(0 -v(v*dt))/(c2dt) it looks like you rewrote dx as v dt, but now you magically have a dt in the denominator as well, t is zero and t' has become vn but, since you worked an example, what if the rocket didn't start co-located with you? Its distance from you is not directly related to its speed. If gamma is 2, then the moving clock is running at half your rate. It accumulates 5 seconds to your 10. How is it always going to be 15 seconds different? If it's next to you, then that's obviously wrong. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imatfaal Posted February 2, 2016 Share Posted February 2, 2016 It's inescapable. You sort of emit confusion... [ot] Everytime I see this thread from the view of all the fora the software (and my settings) truncates the title to "How to define the speed of nons..." and my brain fills in the last word as nonsense. I think my subconscious might be right...[/ot] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DimaMazin Posted February 5, 2016 Author Share Posted February 5, 2016 (edited) You sort of emit confusion. I am wrong,but the thread isn't closed therefore I can try agen. t0=t0'=0 I think nonsimultaneity is \t'-t\ (you can correct me) vn=\t'-t\ / t \...\ is modulus it looks like you rewrote dx as v dt Correct. dx of moving rocket is dt*v dt=t-t0=t vn=\(t-v2t/c2)gamma-t\ / t vn=\gamma*tc2-gamma*v2t-tc2\ / c2t vn=\gamma*c2-gamma*v2-c2\ /c2 For the rocket vn=\2c2-0.75c2 -c2\ / c2=0.25 s'/s I am tired and I can't go on. Edited February 5, 2016 by DimaMazin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted February 5, 2016 Share Posted February 5, 2016 I am wrong,but the thread isn't closed therefore I can try agen. t0=t0'=0 I think nonsimultaneity is \t'-t\ (you can correct me) vn=\t'-t\ / t \...\ is modulus Correct. dx of moving rocket is dt*v dt=t-t0=t vn=\(t-v2t/c2)gamma-t\ / t vn=\gamma*tc2-gamma*v2t-tc2\ / c2t vn=\gamma*c2-gamma*v2-c2\ /c2 For the rocket vn=\2c2-0.75c2 -c2\ / c2=0.25 s'/s I am tired and I can't go on. The math is still wrong t'=(t-v*dx/c2)gamma You can't pull the t to the other side without the gamma You don't have a t'-t term. You have (t' - gamma*t) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DimaMazin Posted February 8, 2016 Author Share Posted February 8, 2016 The math is still wrong t'=(t-v*dx/c2)gamma You can't pull the t to the other side without the gamma You don't have a t'-t term. You have (t' - gamma*t) Then vn=(t'-gamma*t)/(gamma*t) vn=t'/(gamma*t) - 1 vn=(t-v*dx/c2)/t -1 vn=(tc2-v*dx)/c2t -1 vn=(tc2-v*dx-c2t)/c2t vn= (-v*dx)/(c2t) vn= -v2/c2 So? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DimaMazin Posted February 15, 2016 Author Share Posted February 15, 2016 Why is it not just gamma? I have mistaken because didn't know that: (t-v*dx/c2)gamma=t/gamma Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DimaMazin Posted March 1, 2016 Author Share Posted March 1, 2016 We can define nonsimultaneity stream in frame S as: vn=(t-t')/t=gamma-1 I think it works in kinetic energy formula: KE=vnmc2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mordred Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 You know I've watched your threads for sometime now. I've yet to see any mathematics beyond a few basic formula manipulations of which Swansort has pointed out errors within. I've been wondering "How long will it take for you to realize, you need a good understanding of the current model before reformulating your own???" The math level I read in all your threads amount to pure gibberish. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DimaMazin Posted March 1, 2016 Author Share Posted March 1, 2016 We can define nonsimultaneity stream in frame S as: vn=(t-t')/t=gamma-1 I have mistaken agen vn=(t-t')/t=(gamma-1)/gamma Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 I have mistaken agen Something we can all agree on. You just have to remember to say this to yourself before posting in future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now