Moreno Posted February 5, 2016 Posted February 5, 2016 One of the ways to increase energy density of a capacitor is to increase dielectric permittivity of the dielectric. Some sources claim that when some materials (for example some ferroelectrics) approach Curie point their dielectric permittivity start to approach infinity. What happens to dielectric strengths and energy density then? Metals demonstrate infinite dielectric permittivity. What if we take a metal plate completely embedded in dielectric (for example a ceramics) and place it between two capacitor plates? Another way to increase energy density is to increase capacitor plates surface area. What if we use cermet for electrodes in a dielectric capacitor? Cermet is a composite material made of finely meshed metal and ceramic particles. Or we could use MOFs (Metal organic frameworks). How much could it help to increase electrodes surface area and their energy density?
EdEarl Posted February 5, 2016 Posted February 5, 2016 A good starting place to find out about current supercapacitor technology is Wikipedia. They are working toward nano-scale solutions with electrodes and dielectrics being one atom thick. Batteries tend to be less expensive, lighter weight, and smaller than similarly sized supercapacitors, but advancements supercapacitors appear to be gaining on batteries.
Moreno Posted February 6, 2016 Author Posted February 6, 2016 A good starting place to find out about current supercapacitor technology is Wikipedia. They are working toward nano-scale solutions with electrodes and dielectrics being one atom thick. Batteries tend to be less expensive, lighter weight, and smaller than similarly sized supercapacitors, but advancements supercapacitors appear to be gaining on batteries. I wasn't talking about regular supercaps. Their large disadvantage is low working voltage. They don't use dielectrics. I started conversation about dielectric capacitors and ways to improve them.
John Cuthber Posted February 6, 2016 Posted February 6, 2016 If some model says " their dielectric permittivity start to approach infinity." then you know it's wrong.
Moreno Posted February 6, 2016 Author Posted February 6, 2016 (edited) If some model says " their dielectric permittivity start to approach infinity." then you know it's wrong. What technology do you think, could combine best features of dielectric capacitors and supercapacitors? Could there be such a thing as a "dielectric supercapacitor"? Edited February 6, 2016 by Moreno
EdEarl Posted February 6, 2016 Posted February 6, 2016 I don't know what you are asking. A dielectric is an insulator.
Enthalpy Posted February 6, 2016 Posted February 6, 2016 The "ferroelectric materials approaching their Curie point" are ceramic capacitors of type II and III. The proportion of BaTiO3 versus SrTiO3 adjusts the Curie point for maximum capacity around operation temperature. Then it depends on if you want the maximum capacity only (type III), or also pay attention to the temperature drift, dielectric polarization, dielectric losses, linearity (type II) - knowing that only type I are really good on these last aspects. So this is old past. Recent past are supercapacitors a well as niobium electrolytic capacitors (cheaper than tantalum). What the future is, I don't know.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now