Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

A water strider (or Gerridae) is an insectisoid that can balance itself on the sensitive hydrogen-bonding in water molecules almost as if it can "walk on water."

 

Water striders have the uncanny body control to create instant body weight-transference effectively enough to use the surface tension of water molecules to literally run across the surface of bodies of water.

 

If a spider can teach us about the compatible geometric connectivity of objects in space (with their nifty connective webs), then a water strider can teach us about the tangible molecular connectivity of objects in space (with their nifty ability to stride across hydrogen-bonds in water).

 

Einstein told us that space-time is a tangible planar reality and that universe bodies such as planets and stars situate themselves on space-time, creating relative curvatures that create gravity contoured "tracks."

 

If the water strider can walk on water, then perhaps the universe is not only like railroad tracks but also like saran-wrap, allowing bodies and particles to sit on planar surfaces and creating indentations and ditches in which causal events such as dipping and rolling can occur.

 

This 'water-strider' approach to universe physics can perhaps illuminate the deformative forces that gauge object and restoration integrity.

 

Could the 'water-strider' approach help explain structural maintenance (and resilience)?

 

This simple 'water-strider' approach suggests, for example, that gravity is diminutive.

 

If the water strider is a creature that can control weight-distribution with great skill, what can weight-distribution teach us about physics principles such as center of mass, center of gravity, and centrifugal forces?

 

 

 

 

:ph34r:

 

 

Gerridae (Wikipedia)

 

 

 

post-115123-0-70683900-1454890754_thumb.jpg

 

 

post-115123-0-17843600-1454891757_thumb.jpg

 

 

Posted

Thanks for asking.

 

This is more of a systemics approach to particle physics, so the modeling would involve taking ideas from various fields of science.

 

I would say that Matrix Mathematics is the best 'tool' to use to build a model to support this water-strider theory.

 

Matrix Math involves the relations between numbers in an array and can help us build loose models of relevant 'connective reactivity' (i.e., substitution catalysis).

 

I'm a little intimidated since you're an official moderator, but in terms of evidence, why not approach this offbeat theory from a 'history of science' perspective --- i.e., 'what can the theories of universal ether and symbiotic evolution offer to this discussion?'

 

I think this water-strider approach can help us understand the intellectual value of modern age connectivity-guesswork video games such as Q*bert.

 

Conversely, we could re-present congruence geometry as support for this water-strider approach to physics.

 

 

 

 

 

Matrix Mathematics

 

 

Q*bert

 

 

 

post-115123-0-26234900-1454896539.png

 


Also, Maxwell's model of elasticity I think offers interesting perspective to this theory:

 

 

Maxwell material

 

 

Basically, this 'water-strider' theory presents the value of connectivity modeling.

Posted

 

I'm a little intimidated since you're an official moderator, but in terms of evidence, why not approach this offbeat theory from a 'history of science' perspective --- i.e., 'what can the theories of universal ether and symbiotic evolution offer to this discussion?'

.

Because we have rules, and specific ones for posting in speculations

http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/86720-guidelines-for-participating-in-speculations-discussions/

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.