Jump to content

The Surface of Spacetime.


geordief

Recommended Posts

I feel that this is a fairly common expression but what does it actually mean?

 

If I write the phrase "The surface of spacetime" what does it describe?

 

As far as I have been able to understand ,spacetime is a mathematical construct and consequently am I right to think that "the surface of spacetime" is also a mathematical construct and not a physical object as such?

 

Is it a region where things happen?

 

Is the event horizon of a BH such a region? Are there other examples?

 

I think I have been told that you can make a surface mathematically in spacetime by holding one of the variables constant. Would this be right?

Edited by geordief
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would depend on how you defined it.

Do you mean me personally or "you" in the sense of "one" ?

 

I am not qualified to define it myself as I am struggling to understand the concept at the outset (I am reading about intrinsic curvature at the moment to perhaps give you an idea of where I am in this regard)

 

If you mean in the sense of "one" ,does that imply the phrase can be used to mean different things ,perhaps depending on the context?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you mean me personally or "you" in the sense of "one" ?

 

I am not qualified to define it myself as I am struggling to understand the concept at the outset (I am reading about intrinsic curvature at the moment to perhaps give you an idea of where I am in this regard)

 

If you mean in the sense of "one" ,does that imply the phrase can be used to mean different things ,perhaps depending on the context?

If you don't know what it means, if you wrote it it wouldn't mean much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I write the phrase "The surface of spacetime" what does it describe?

As it is written it is ambiguous. By itself there is no notion of a surface of a space-time.

 

One could mean a Cauchy surface, but then one would just say 'Cauchy surface'.

 

I expect the term is just pop-sci based on thinking of spaces as embedded objects in a higher dimensional space. Think about the surface of a balloon or ball. This only makes sense when one represents such thing as being a substructure of R^3. In its own right the surface of a sphere makes little sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.