Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

That's an interesting question. Wikipedia says there are an estimated 20,000-25,000 protein-coding genes in the human genome. What percentage of this regulates brain function?

 

Another way to think about it may be to exclude functions that the brain doesn't perform. Eg. Secrete insulin, exocrine digestive enzymes, turn over urea, secrete surfactant, produce renin, ACE, aldosterone, cortisol, androgens. Structurally there may be less collagen and muscle fibres in the brain matrix since glia fulfils the role but meninges would be composed of connective tissue.

Posted

It is not that easy. There are insulin receptors in brain tissue, as well as insulin itself (although it could be of peripheral origin). Point is that many proteins, especially those involved in signaling can play varied roles in many tissues.

Posted

Quoting the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, "At least a third of the approximately 20,000 different genes that make up the human genome are active (expressed) primarily in the brain. This is the highest proportion of genes expressed in any part of the body. These genes influence the development and function of the brain, and ultimately control how we move, think, feel, and behave".

 

http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/brain_basics/genes_at_work.htm

The human protein Atlas quotes 67% http://www.proteinatlas.org/humanproteome/brain

 

Hmm what's the best way to exclude proteins not present in the brain? The common origin of Neuroectoderm and possibly neural crest makes it difficult... perhaps proteins of endodermal, yolk sac, or extraembryonic mesoderm origin?

For example, alpha Fetoprotein is produced by the developing world yolk sac and liver.

Posted

Pretty much it can only be done empirically. However, since more are involved in brain functions (and even more if we include development) what would be the benefit of this exercise?

Posted

No, I meant the exercise you were proposing, trying to find proteins that are not expressed in the brain a priori. The study was used to get a general overview of expression patterns in different tissue, rather than finding tissue specific proteins. The qualitative mapping is something that was done in the last two decades and only had limited use with regard to tissues. More importantly than just presence or absence is the dynamics of expression and how they work together. Note that this is very close to my own research interests and I can go to quite some depth in this area, if necessary.

Posted

The proteins related to the brain has already been mapped a posteriori. For the sake of forum discussion it's interesting to read the results and reason which proteins are not related, but I wouldn't misinterpret it as "Proposing an exercise to try to find proteins that are not expressed in the brain a priori". If the subject is close to your research interest you can propose your own exercises.

Posted

You misunderstand the research question. It is not about finding what is and what is not in brain tissue (which, BTW is not entirely mapped anyway), as that is simply not very informative. The expression is where the interest is. One of the few other areas where qualitative information could be interesting if a high resolution comparison of different brain tissue.

Of course qualitative studies have been done, but we have not learned much from it. The a posteriori comment was aimed at your earlier post, where you specifically speculated about excluding proteins.

 

Or to put it differently you are free to look at lists of proteins that have not been detected in tissue so far (which n is not the same as not being synthesized), but at this point there is little to learn from it.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Among some geneticists have an idea that what you need already in early childhood to examine the genotype of the child and find out what it is more, and what less capable. And then specifically prepare your child for the appropriate profession.
How do you think this idea should be implemented in life?

Posted

I think you are thinking about a "Brave New World", which luckily is fiction. However, the part that people are seriously thinking about is to look for potential diseases and risk factors and ways to mitigate them.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

All genes are present in (almost) all cells. Many genes are required for basic cellular processes and are expressed in varying degrees in all tissues. An usually somewhat limited set of genes are expressed exclusively or mostly in certain tissues. Monitoring of genes is obviously not useful, but standard mRNA analysis (q-PCR, microarrays, RNA-Seq etc.) are used to monitor transcription, while protein (e.g. Western, ElLISA) or proteome analyses are used to monitor translation.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.