swansont Posted March 25, 2016 Author Posted March 25, 2016 It happened the other day, when someone thought they were "posting accepted physics to disprove the proposal" but that in itself was wrong and was corrected by another person other than the OP. So that correcting action is not covered by your 3 categories. If the incorrect physics was posted as a rebuttal to the conjecture, then the correcting action is still posting accepted physics to rebut the OP.
Robittybob1 Posted March 25, 2016 Posted March 25, 2016 (edited) If the incorrect physics was posted as a rebuttal to the conjecture, then the correcting action is still posting accepted physics to rebut the OP. It cancelled the incorrect post, but neither helped the proposal (A) nor rebutted it ( C ). Edited March 25, 2016 by Robittybob1
imatfaal Posted March 25, 2016 Posted March 25, 2016 ! Moderator Note It cancelled the incorrect post, but neither helped the proposal (A) nor rebutted it ( C ). OK time to stop arguing. You are basically trolling whether you know it or not. Swansont and the other members in this thread have made it abundantly clear what a hijack is. Your continued hair-splitting and/or failure to understand very simple instructions/rules is just too much - stop now. Thread Locked - the point has been made and you are just (deliberately or not) confusing the issue.
Recommended Posts