Sensei Posted October 10, 2020 Posted October 10, 2020 Too long to quote. It will be fun only for programmers. https://hackernoon.com/how-it-feels-to-learn-javascript-in-2016-d3a717dd577f
Ghideon Posted October 24, 2020 Posted October 24, 2020 Recently I returned to a discussion after a break and I was suddenly accused of not taking centrifugal forces into account. I guess I was out of the loop for a while. 3
Area54 Posted October 24, 2020 Posted October 24, 2020 (edited) 23 minutes ago, Ghideon said: Recently I returned to a discussion after a break and I was suddenly accused of not taking centrifugal forces into account. I guess I was out of the loop for a while. Spinning your wheels? Edited October 24, 2020 by Area54 1
joigus Posted October 24, 2020 Posted October 24, 2020 22 minutes ago, Ghideon said: Recently I returned to a discussion after a break and I was suddenly accused of not taking centrifugal forces into account. I guess I was out of the loop for a while. I was thrown away from that discussion with the escape velocity.
Phi for All Posted October 24, 2020 Posted October 24, 2020 31 minutes ago, joigus said: I was thrown away from that discussion with the escape velocity. Another name for an escape clause is a 'loophole". That's probably how Ghideon fell out.
joigus Posted October 24, 2020 Posted October 24, 2020 6 minutes ago, Phi for All said: Another name for an escape clause is a 'loophole". That's probably how Ghideon fell out. LOL. A noose, that's what it is. <giggle>
Ghideon Posted October 24, 2020 Posted October 24, 2020 25 minutes ago, Phi for All said: Another name for an escape clause is a 'loophole". That's probably how Ghideon fell out. Probably. But more likely I tried to point out the holes in another members argument regarding outwards acceleration and I went off on a tangent.
joigus Posted October 25, 2020 Posted October 25, 2020 (edited) Mating-brilliant. (@ Koti.) Edited October 25, 2020 by joigus
joigus Posted October 28, 2020 Posted October 28, 2020 This could be hard proof of tunneling for macroscopic objects...
John Cuthber Posted October 28, 2020 Posted October 28, 2020 3 hours ago, joigus said: This could be hard proof of tunneling for macroscopic objects... Three of those images imply too much power in the wrong place. The other is a horse. 5
geordief Posted October 28, 2020 Posted October 28, 2020 6 minutes ago, zapatos said: Three have horsepower. One is a horse's ass. Let's not denigrate our equine companions. Otherwise ,fair comment.
Curious layman Posted October 29, 2020 Posted October 29, 2020 (edited) Edited October 29, 2020 by Curious layman 3
michel123456 Posted November 13, 2020 Posted November 13, 2020 Translated by me from https://www.socomic.gr/en/2018/01/kourafelkithra-socrates/ 4
Raniyah Posted November 19, 2020 Posted November 19, 2020 If con is the opposite of pro, then isn’t Congress the opposite of progress? 1
Raniyah Posted November 20, 2020 Posted November 20, 2020 If you could kick the person in the pants responsible for most of your trouble, you wouldn’t sit for a month (Theodore Roosevelt) 2
MSC Posted November 20, 2020 Posted November 20, 2020 How many meals a day does a mathematician eat? 9 They eat 3 squared meals a day. Good thing portion sizes are relative.. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now