An ultra materialistic view of the universe evolution.

[Ruslan_Sharipov]

One cannot speak about the trajectory of a cannonball until it flew along this trajectory. One can speak about a calculated trajectory of the cannonball once a cannon is pointed at the target. However a real cannonball can leave this calculated trajectory. For example if it meets another cannonball.

Now let's proceed from a cannonball to the universe. Cosmological theories present it as a four-dimensional continuum. It encloses in itself our past, our present and our future. But the future has not yet come. Therefore the four-dimensional continuum of the universe is similar to the calculated trajectory of a cannonball at those parts that correspond to the future. Only those its parts that correspond to the past do veraciously exist. The evolution wave runs along our theoretical universe. It separates the future from the past. The front of the evolution wave is our present. It is a three-dimensional continuum that moves along the four-dimensional continuum of the theoretical universe just like a cannonball moves along its trajectory.

Now let's proceed from a theoretical picture to the real universe. The front of the evolution wave separates the truely materialized part of the universe from that part which does not yet exist. What does happen with the four-dimensional continuum on the front of the evolution wave? Here it is being built, i.e. new points are glued to it. If we believe in the discreteness of the universe on the Planck scale, the process of evolution can be compared to the crystal growth from a solution or from a melt.

Moreover, if we believe in materialistic nature of the universe growth, we can try to influence upon it. For example, we can try to tear the tissue of the universe along some two-dimensional surface enclosed in the front of the evolution wave. If the tissue gap does not heal immediately after being torn, we shall observe some absolutely impenetrable wall - an edge of the manifold or a so called edge of the universe. Such an object can have very unusual physical properties.

I would like to discuss the above conception. Does it contradict modern physical theories or it is in concordance with them?