Precession? (classically seen)

[Capiert]

Precession

happens also on earth.

Momentum can be rotated to the opposite side

where it then has the opposite direction.

That effect depends on impulse mom=F*t, (duration time t).

The slower the top turns, the longer the mass (each molecule)

can be affected (on 1 side, vs the opposite).

Thus a spinning top, will swoop (=precess) extremely low (horizontal)

at slow rotating speed, (rather that stand up almost straight vertical).

I.e.

Longer duration time t,

that the mass has (F=Wt=m*g) accelerated down (fallen),

(or been left behind, push theory)

so the angle is (larger) lower, e.g. further down (wrt top).

 

 

(Note: How can a mass have force, when itsself is (only) part of (the) force (equation)?

Who owns who? What owns what? (A factor can be owned.)

That hierarchy must surely be obvious for those who can see & grasp.

Force has mass (in its product, 1 of the 2 factors),

but mass can't have force unless m=F/g (it's divided by acceleration (freefall)).

(But per acceleration g, is meaning it must have been "accelerated" (past tense, not during).)

Thus that force (F=m*g) is only an 'accelerating mass', not a driving (force).

It is a observation (effect), not a cause that drives.)

 

 

The twist (curve) direction between the (2) axii

(e.g. Left vs right hand rule,

for generators vs motors)

depends on the Coriolis acceleration,

a (tangential) speed difference wrt radius,

e.g. orbit around the sun, galaxy too.

 

Since speed difference is (proportional to the mass's) impulse,

that has affect on how

& which direction things twist (curve).

 

Do I really need Einstein's calculation about Mercury,

for here on earth?

Especially when it's understandable without him?

Back then they could hardly measure a difference.

& no one cares that it is on the boarders of tolerance

& influence (prestige).

Please bring me something more significant in range >60%, rather than ppm.

For a wild goose chase, that only 1 person performed.

All eggs in 1 basket. (I need something more than just splitting a hair.)

Something I can see. Was there a photo? or 2?

 

The Stern_Gerlach experiment can also be explained as,

a (static) magnetic gradient*

that can be seen as a(n extra) magnetic field change

wrt position, for a moving charge.

Different spins are not needed.

If a charged electron beam is shot left of symmetry

(midline, of max vertical magnetic field)

then the beam would travel up (lets say, because it 1st moves left, slightly);

the beam going (slightly) to the right side (of magnetic field max, middle)

would go down.

Thus the (beam also) splits, without electrons having to "spin" (at all)

while they travel

in a non_homogeneous magnetic field.

Thus Electrons' "Spin" is not needed. Throw it out.

At least there. For that explaination.

Equal populations, up vs down (output),

has to do with how much NOT off_center the beam is, left vs right (as input).

 

*magnetic_field density change

 

I expect the Stark effect would be similar,

because magnetic field is from moving charges.

High voltages accelerate, or repel.

 

The contra is, if an electron is a ball, we know balls can spin. e.g. baseballs.

 

Maybe we should split into themes?

Edited May 28, 2016 by Capiert