geordief Posted June 2, 2016 Share Posted June 2, 2016 It seems that on a micro level most of what there is is empty space.** Again on the cosmic level we have space between bodies such as ,for example galaxies or solar systems. Is there any qualitative difference between these two kinds of spaces or is the "difference" merely explained by the relative size and location of these spaces? ** it is said that an atom is almost entirely "empty space" ,as an example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted June 2, 2016 Share Posted June 2, 2016 I don't think atoms are largely empty space. They are full of "electron" (i.e. electron orbitals). This can be seen in experiments that visualise atoms and molecules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordief Posted June 2, 2016 Author Share Posted June 2, 2016 That is interesting. I have also heard that "outer space" is not empty. So does "empty space" not exist as an absolute at all? Is there a theory that space and matter and two sides of the same coin?(or something along those lines) Are they possibly an emergent property of something more "elemental" ? Perhaps I am garbling/rehashing something I have heard before without understanding it well.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now