The observation beyond space: The final matter

[Ihcisphysicist]

The observation beyond space.

The final matter (Structure of space pockets)

 

The 21^st century universe of science is remarkable, the advances in technology and understanding of the physical matters has but only broaden towards more definite cutting edge analysis. But since the inception of complex theories and phenomenal laws of physics during the few hundred years, science has really broaden wide but even the geniuses in different decades and eras have missed to conclude the beginning and end, the tiniest and the largest of the universe from various perspectives. Although I have to say that in between the anatomy of the first and last i.e. in the middle exist the current laws of 21^st century’s science and it is remarkable that science have come this far so drastically even though the rest of human kind denies to acknowledge science whilst thriving in the luxuries marveled by the brainchild of science.

 

The way the universe works is quantifiable because a very significant form of physics exists in every realm that could contradict from a realm to another as the laws of physics do evolve as the matters evolve in time from a single perspective. The Science that exists now has failed miserably to rationalize the biggest questions of the universe because studies regarding the micro and macro universe are beyond human’s perception with the availability of hard facts and instrument s limited. I do believe that science can achieve many groundbreaking discoveries if we start understanding the very matters that build our universe and supposedly the purpose of our existence if any.

(Because the behavior of the final matter could help solve the missing link in the chain about the machinery of the universe)

 

The final matter (Structure of space pockets)

 

In order to understand the behavior of the universe we have to understand what makes the matters in different voids of space and here on earth in different environments, influence the behavior of different matters respectively. Since it is eminent the existence of the tiniest matter in space instead of perceiving an endless loop in a subatomic realm, hence the tiniest particles be it the string particles or the ‘God particles’ or any other nano particles do suspend or lie on another entity i.e. space. Having stated the obvious and nothing new above, the other question is whether we may have been wrong about time, matter and space all along. What if the inter-relationship of the three may not be as the way we thought it to be? What if the three entity are not distinct concepts but fairly close.

Since the concept about the existence of the tiniest matter is dynamic and mildly irrational in concluding, there is another case that could understand the entirety of physics and beyond, which is the final matter. The final particle is not necessarily the tiniest particle or matter, it is the final structure that binds the space around the whole universe. The final matter is space itself but not the great wide that expands but the space in its very structure which is far down beyond subatomic realm. In short space itself is a matter but not as in the three general states of matter or even the fourth. It could possibly be in another state and form but nevertheless the chains in the structure of space pockets interlinks flexibly throughout the edges of our universe and it is this pocket wherein lies various matters.

We can understand the existence of space pockets by relating it with various phenomena that science has explained in different circumstances.

Gravity do influence space pockets and it is only when gravity or a force acts on it, it contracts or expand that impacts all the matters inside it and in turn the effect on the space pockets affects the behavior of the matters in given conditions respectively. When we think about the gravity of the earth sucking any matter down to the ground it does contract space not in the worst way of course but only as much as it has to and it is this condition that has favored sustenance of life on earth. When gravity contracts the space pockets, most of the matters also get dragged along the ripple and crease of the pocket which is why even air is limited in higher altitudes and abundant in lower areas where the pocket is more focused and concentrated. Thus the gravity of an object could influence the conditions around it not directly but because of the intermediary which is flexible not only in physique but also in the way it interacts with the behavior of different matters of different natures in different conditions. Without the influence of earth’s gravity as in the case of outer space, it could seem to be empty and null but different forces radiates in and around space from different realms at different points. And in different planet or celestial body, since the force of gravity would differ from earth’s, the pressure acting on the pockets would be different thus sustaining different conditions than that of earth’s.

 

(to be continued)

[Phi for All]

!

Moderator Note

Moved to Speculations due to the non-mainstream science involved.

 

Please help everyone out with your non-standard terminology. What do you mean when you say "realms"?

 

Since this is a science discussion site, can you provide any evidence to support your ideas? Please show this as well, since I can guarantee someone is going to ask for it.

 

You don't need to respond to this note, I just wanted to help get you started on the right foot in this discussion.

[Strange]

The way the universe works is quantifiable because a very significant form of physics exists in every realm that could contradict from a realm to another as the laws of physics do evolve as the matters evolve in time from a single perspective.

 

 

It isn't clear what this means.

 

1. What is a "realm"?

2. Can you provide a mathematical definition of realm?

3. How can one realm contradict another one?

4. What evidence do you have that the laws of physics evolve?

 

 

studies regarding the micro and macro universe are beyond human’s perception with the availability of hard facts and instrument s limited.

 

We seem to have done a pretty god job of observing the entire (observable) universe. And of observing quantum scale events.

 

So can you clarify what you think the problem is here?

 

 

I do believe that science can achieve many groundbreaking discoveries if we start understanding the very matters that build our universe

 

Can you explain what, exactly, you think is wrong with our current models? Do you have some evidence that contradicts our current models?

 

 

Because the behavior of the final matter could help solve the missing link in the chain about the machinery of the universe

 

What, exactly, is the "missing link" you refer to?

 

 

In order to understand the behavior of the universe we have to understand what makes the matters in different voids of space and here on earth in different environments, influence the behavior of different matters respectively.

 

Can you say exactly what aspects of that are not explained by our current theories?

 

 

We can understand the existence of space pockets by relating it with various phenomena that science has explained in different circumstances.

 

What experimental evidence do you have for these "space pockets"?

What properties do they have?

 

 

(to be continued)

 

I assume that will include the mathematics of your model?

 

Will you be telling us what testable (i.e. quantitative) predictions can your model make that allow it to be compared with other models?

[Ihcisphysicist]

It isn't clear what this means.

 

1. What is a "realm"?

2. Can you provide a mathematical definition of realm?

3. How can one realm contradict another one?

4. What evidence do you have that the laws of physics evolve?

 

Realm could either denote a metaphorical alternate universe where the laws of physics would either be inexplicit or simpler but nevertheless different from ours as for in this case realm means a specific part of universe, bigger or smaller from a human’s perspective.

As of now since the concept is still in its initial stage so I can’t present the math behind it, perhaps someday.

Let’s for example say, in the edge of a black hole, the way the particles would move or behave and the forces and pressure operating around it would surely defy the laws of physics that applies under earth’s environment and conditions which is reasonable I presume. (Realm could also denote a world for where a group or diversity of matters or consciousnesses perceive in close to each other’s perception time continuum thus in a particular part of space since the time sense of perception of matters differ with size and mass, there exist different section of realms in a given space with accordance to the time sense in perception). A simple example is that the subatomic realm and the micro realm exist around us without us being not able to feel or sense it or better yet, the existence of human does little bother a neutron star imploding if it had a form of consciousness of its own. As for the laws of physics that would contradict or differ from a realm to another is that for instance the model of an atom is represented by neutron and protons at the centre and electrons revolving the nucleus which is not so different as in the case of our solar system but since the mass and size of matters do influence its behavior with another force hence the structure and pattern and the laws of physical interaction will differ respectively. Finally the pressure of the gravity acting on the structure of the space pocket would also influence the conditions of the matters and how they interact thus a simple difference between the forces of gravity of planets would also mean different laws of physics.

The laws of physics do evolve but not as in a ‘day’s time’ but to understand this from our perspective it will take probably eons of time or less to witness the change if we ever can. Supposedly a heavy star at the pitfall of its end, the pressure and force around the energy will begin to shift or change and just before it implodes the current law that enabled to hold it together will breakdown and as it does, the matters in it would behave in a panic mode and as the position and points of pressure shifts, a new kind of contract between the matters to interact or repel with each other will establish itself as matters don’t just disintegrate to oblivion.

They say that the dark matter is omnipresent and ever exists because something that represents or defines nothingness is only rational but what if instead of the dark matter which is mysterious in nature, another entity which is the final structure of space, like sacs of tiny threads like platforms where everything that is something lies.

Edited June 9, 2016 by imatfaal
resolve quote issues

[Strange]

Let’s for example say, in the edge of a black hole, the way the particles would move or behave and the forces and pressure operating around it would surely defy the laws of physics that applies under earth’s environment and conditions which is reasonable I presume.

 

But we have physics theories that do describe what happens there.

 

 

the model of an atom is represented by neutron and protons at the centre and electrons revolving the nucleus which is not so different as in the case of our solar system

 

That model of the atom is just wrong.

 

 

As of now since the concept is still in its initial stage so I can’t present the math behind it, perhaps someday.

 

So, no maths and no evidence. This seems pretty pointless.

[Ihcisphysicist]

But we have physics theories that do describe what happens there.

 

And can you really base the theories given the condition that the scientists weren't there as the black hole was sucking voids of space.

 

 

That model of the atom is just wrong.

 

Nothing is 100.00% accurate if you really had the means to check it in physics.

 

 

So, no maths and no evidence. This seems pretty pointless.

 

Not necessarily math is required as it is in its initial stage but you saying pointless makes everything pointless I guess.

 

[Strange]

And can you really base the theories given the condition that the scientists weren't there as the black hole was sucking voids of space.

As they are based on well-tested science, I would say they are better than random, untested speculation.

 

Nothing is 100.00% accurate if you really had the means to check it in physics.

 

We have models of the atom which are tested. The one you refer to was abandoned long ago. It doesn't work.

 

Not necessarily math is required as it is in its initial stage but you saying pointless makes everything pointless I guess.

 

I certainly don't think everything is pointless. Ideas based on evidence can be useful.

 

Perhaps you could tell us how you would test your idea? What would convince you it is wrong? (That is, after all, how science works.)

Edited June 9, 2016 by Strange

[Ihcisphysicist]

The final matter could explain so much in the universe, the center and the edges of the universe, multiverse, space travel (not via worm hole) etc. The fact that space itself is a form of matter could mean that the universe is not infinite and since time is a sense of perception via and inside space pockets only thus a universe is limited to the extent of these giant molecule of space pockets. The aftermath of one universe or outside the edges of space pockets would be an entity where there would be no matters and complete void with no sense of time perception until the next giant molecule of another space pockets where in another universe dwell.

As they are based on well-tested science, I would say they are better than random, untested speculation.

 

So you do admit that your intelligence and everything that you believe in goes to the mercy of the highest bidder regardless of the fact that many popular theories weren't backed by means and resources in the initial stages but still triumphed in the end.

[Strange]

So you do admit that your intelligence and everything that you believe in goes to the mercy of the highest bidder regardless of the fact that many popular theories weren't backed by means and resources in the initial stages but still triumphed in the end.

 

What?

 

Science is based on mathematical models tested against evidence. Those are the reasons that theories get accepted or rejected.

 

If you want your ideas to be considered you need some evidence and a model to explain it. And, ideally, a demonstration of how well the model fits the data.