dimreepr Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 You're missing the point, there is no grey in a true purpose, it's a Boolean state true or false. I take it you don't have children? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StringJunky Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 The meaning of life is finding the meaning of life; once you've found it you need another one! The journey is more important than the destination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dimreepr Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 If you've really found it, sometimes you don't need another. The journey is more important than the destination. The journey should be enjoyed but why not the destination? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StringJunky Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 If you've really found it, sometimes you don't need another. The journey should be enjoyed but why not the destination? The journey is the the act of learning. If you just want to sit around knowing what you've learnt that's your choice but in that sense you stop growing as a person. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marieltrokan Posted June 20, 2016 Author Share Posted June 20, 2016 Is it possible that learning is the dilemma of needing division, and imbalance? To continue to learn is to need inequality amidst the world? E.g. to learn is to need nations to exist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordief Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 (edited) The journey should be enjoyed but why not the destination? Because there is no "destination"? It is like a mirage in the desert? Edited June 20, 2016 by geordief 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dimreepr Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Understanding what ones learnt on the journey doesn’t make one immune to learning more at the destination; you don’t need another journey if you’re happy to ponder the last. Because there is no "destination"? It is like a mirage in the desert? Not all oasis is a mirage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordief Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 If you Understanding what ones learnt on the journey doesn’t make one immune to learning more at the destination; you don’t need another journey if you’re happy to ponder the last. But you do not have the luxury of "taking a breather" . Life moves on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StringJunky Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Is it possible that learning is the dilemma of needing division, and imbalance? To continue to learn is to need inequality amidst the world? E.g. to learn is to need nations to exist. Yes, there's kind a of disequilibrium that keeps you moving. If you But you do not have the luxury of "taking a breather" . Life moves on. It's an ever changing kaleidoscope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marieltrokan Posted June 20, 2016 Author Share Posted June 20, 2016 I appreciate your reply. If anyone is this same truth (i.e. the cast and crew of The Conjuring 2), is life's meaning then to perhaps cancel this truth via mutual recognition? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dimreepr Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 But you do not have the luxury of "taking a breather" . You do, if you’re happy to travel and/or arrive, the trick is to accept what you have now, moving or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Der_Neugierige Posted June 26, 2016 Share Posted June 26, 2016 There is no meaning of life. Life is meaningless. That is why commiting suicide is not morally wrong philosophically, its only wrong in the eyes of religion and social comtext. Even commiting suicide is not bad biological viewed. I mean even our own cells can commit suicide. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dimreepr Posted June 27, 2016 Share Posted June 27, 2016 There is no meaning of life. Life is meaningless. That is why commiting suicide is not morally wrong philosophically, its only wrong in the eyes of religion and social comtext. Even commiting suicide is not bad biological viewed. I mean even our own cells can commit suicide. Life has whatever meaning you choose to give it; "Work out your own salvation. Do not depend on others." - Buddha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now