Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

No shit Sherlock.

 

So the answer to the OP isn't just about oxygen.

Indeed, but the conversation was focused on the oxygen balance, not other factors as well. It helps to actually follow a conversation.

 

 

Yes, we can survive permanently down to just above half the present oxygen concentration at sea-level; the phytoplankton production should cover the loss from trees being destroyed, in principle, but in practice, there will no doubt be severe consequences from it that may destroy us anyway.

Edited by StringJunky
Posted (edited)

Indeed, but the conversation was focused on the oxygen balance, not other factors as well. It helps to actually follow a conversation.

 

 

 

I followed the conversation, but the answer can't be polarised to just the ability to breath or not, we also need food, water and a reasonable temperature.

Edited by dimreepr

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.