Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hey everyone,

 

Why do we include ΔG° in this equation? Why does the Gibbs Free energy at standard conditions matter when finding the Gibbs Free energy of a certain reaction? I know that it is important for comparison and can help to determine which way a reaction will go, but I do not see why it is a fundamental part of the equation. Why does the free energy of a reaction have to rely on the free energy from the standard form? That seems very strange to me, and you don't see that kind of dependence in ΔG = ΔH - TΔS. Is the equation ΔG = ΔG° + RT ln(Q) somehow derived from ΔG = ΔH - TΔS?

 

Thank you for any help!

Edited by galpinj
Posted (edited)

This is an important question so I am going to work through it at some length.

It is important to distinguish between the various Gs and G0 s and their deltas.

 

G on its own refers to the Gibbs Free Energy function, which is a function of state.

 

G0 is just the constant of integration, and is made specific to each reactant and reaction by choosing a stated condition.

 

The integration is not of ΔG = ΔH - TΔS as you thought but of either Maxwell's relation

 

[math]{\left( {\frac{{\partial G}}{{\partial P}}} \right)_T}[/math]

Which brings out the fact that this is developed for gaseous reactants at constant temperature
or of the equation
[math]dG = VdP - SdT[/math]
Since T is constant, SdT = 0 and we are left with the following
[math]{G_T} = \int {Vdp = nRT\int {\frac{{dP}}{P}} } = nRT{\log _e}\left( P \right) + {\rm{constant}}[/math]
The state function of temperature has a value at any T given by integrating the above
Working per mole n = 1 and we set the constant equal to G0
Thus
[math]{\rm{Constant}} = {G^0}[/math]
and
[math]G = RTLo{g_e}\left( P \right) + {G^0}[/math]
This is the general thermodynamic equation.
To apply it to a particular chemical reaction say
[math]A + B \to C + D[/math]
we calculate the change in G as ΔG by summing the values for the reactants products and subtracting the values for the products reactants
Edit oops ! :embarass:
[math]\Delta G = {G_C} + {G_D} - {G_A} - {G_B}[/math]
Each of these four components individually follows the general law so substituting this in
[math]\Delta G = \left( {RTLo{g_e}\left( {{P_C}} \right) + G_C^0} \right) + \left( {RTLo{g_e}\left( {{P_D}} \right) + G_D^0} \right) - \left( {RTLo{g_e}\left( {{P_A}} \right) + G_A^0} \right) - \left( {RTLo{g_e}\left( {{P_B}} \right) + G_B^0} \right)[/math]
Collecting terms and rearranging
[math]\Delta G = \left( {G_C^0 + G_D^0 - G_A^0 - G_B^0} \right) + \left( {RTLo{g_e}\left( {{P_C}} \right) + RTLo{g_e}\left( {{P_D}} \right) - RTLo{g_e}\left( {{P_A}} \right) - RTLo{g_e}\left( {{P_B}} \right)} \right)[/math]
This shows the various reactant and product contributions to [math]\Delta {G^0}[/math] in the first bracket
Doing some algebra on the logs yields
[math]\Delta G = \Delta {G^0} + \left( {RTLo{g_e}\left( {\frac{{{P_C}{P_D}}}{{{P_A}{P_B}}}} \right)} \right)[/math]
Defining the reaction coefficient, Q as
[math]Q = \left( {\frac{{{P_C}{P_D}}}{{{P_A}{P_B}}}} \right)[/math]
and substitution yields
[math]\Delta G = \Delta {G^0} + RTLo{g_e}\left( Q \right)[/math]
Which is your equation for this particular reaction.
Remember always that G on its own is general, but introducing G0 makes it specific to a particular reaction.
Edited by studiot
Posted

I see that you were online after I posted yesterday so presumably you saw my reply.

I note also that you are a biologist, although you have posted this in the Chemistry section so I if you have any questions arising, don't hesitate to ask.

 

Some further notes.

 

If the temperature is not constant then you also have to integrate the SdT term. This can be performed at constant pressure.

 

My analysis was for gases and the pressures are therefore partial pressures if there is more than one.

 

Pressures are a measure of (molar) concentration and the reaction quotient or coefficient, q, can also be described in these terms, which is good for non gaseous components.

 

You have used Q for the quotient, which is becoming common, when K used to be used.

There is a danger of confusing the q used in the First Law with Q which is (partly) why K was originally chosen.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.