Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It is impossible in general for polynomials of order 5 and above - see the Abel–Ruffini theorem which states there are no algebraic solutions of such polynomial equations.

 

Note that this does not mean there are no solutions (real or complex), just that you cannot write then in an algebraic form (in terms of radicals). Also it does not mean that you cannot find algebraic solutions to some polynomials of higher order.

 

You should also look up Galois theory which is the theory that deals with this question properly.

Posted (edited)

A good place to start looking is Ian Stewart's little book.

 

Galois Theory

 

Chapman and Hall

 

Professor Stewart has a well deserved reputation for making mathematics understandable, without loss of correctness.

 

You might also need

 

Introduction to Group Theory

 

W Ledermann

 

Longmans

 

since it is hard to do Galois without being doing Abel.

Edited by studiot
Posted

...

 

You should also look up Galois theory which is the theory that deals with this question properly.

It's possible that he should "walk away" happy in the knowledge that the answer to his questions were "no" and "yes".

 

I can't speak for him but (as far as I'm concerned) knowing that we can only analytically solve polynomial equations up to quintics, is well within the sort of maths I understand: but Galois theory isn't.

 

Incidentally, it's sometimes possible to solve higher order polynomials by inspection.

Consider (x-1)(x-2)(x-3)(x-4)(x-5)(x-6)=0

Posted

It's possible that he should "walk away" happy in the knowledge that the answer to his questions were "no" and "yes".

 

I can't speak for him but (as far as I'm concerned) knowing that we can only analytically solve polynomial equations up to quintics, is well within the sort of maths I understand: but Galois theory isn't.

 

Incidentally, it's sometimes possible to solve higher order polynomials by inspection.

Consider (x-1)(x-2)(x-3)(x-4)(x-5)(x-6)=0

You said up to quintics, it should have been up to quartics.

Posted

It's possible that he should "walk away" happy in the knowledge that the answer to his questions were "no" and "yes".

You are right - so I we change my statement to 'one could look up Galois theory to understand the reasons why the answer is no'.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.