Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The isosceles triangle ABC has AB = AC and angle BAC = 20 degrees.

 

The point D lies on AC such that angle DBC = 60 degrees.

The point E lies on AB such that angle ECB = 50 degrees.

 

Find angle EDB.

Posted

this is really bothering me. it seems like there is enough information. geometry got me a bunch of info, but im still missing the 4 crucial angles. algebra seems to just go in circles, and i cant think of a way to apply trig to it...

 

maybe i should have paid more attention in intermediate algebra. : P

Posted

Well, I haven’t thought it right through,

But my idea is this.

 

There are two overlapping triangles, one facing left and one facing right.

Each of the two triangles has only one unknown angle.

 

The two original triangles are locked into a relationship.

 

You can calculate the two unknown angles with the aid of Pythagoras.

 

Relationship between the two unknown angles will give me that answer,

or at least the answer when subtracted from 180 degrees.

 

Any use to you?

Posted

your gonna have to tell me which triangles your talking about.

 

 

there are 4 angles in the whole thing that i cant find. marked w, x, y and z.

triangles.bmp

Posted
i have it uploaded, cant find a way to include it.
Click the 'Manage Attachments' button below the 'Submit Reply' button, and select your attachment.
Posted

sin(FBE)/sin(FEB) = EF/BF

sin(FCD)/sin(FDC) = DF/CF

sin(FBC)/sin(FCB) = CF/BF

sin(FED)/sin(FDE) = DF/EF

So:

 

sin(FED)/sin(FDE) = DF/EF = (CF*sin(FCD)/sin(FDC))/(BF*sin(FBE)/sin(FEB)) = (sin(FEB)*sin(FCD)*sin(FBC))/(sin(FBE)*sin(FDC)*sin(FCB)) = (sin(40)*sin(20)*sin(50))/(sin(30)*sin(50)*sin(60))

 

FED = 110-x

sin(110-x)/sin(x) = (sin(40)*sin(20)*sin(50))/(sin(30)*sin(50)*sin(60))

sin(110)*tan(x) - cos(110) = (sin(40)*sin(20)*sin(50))/(sin(30)*sin(50)*sin(60))

tan(x) = ((sin(40)*sin(20)*sin(50))/(sin(30)*sin(50)*sin(60)) + cos(110))/sin(110)

Find x.

-Uncool-

Posted

I might be on the wrong track,

but I see only a total of three overlapping transparent triangles.

 

The other angles are an illusion.

 

Do you get what I mean?

Posted

Callipygous, using your diagram above i have come up with four eqaution as follows:

 

40 + X + Y = 180

50 + W + Z = 180

70 + Y + Z = 180

20 + X + W = 180

 

using these four equations it should then be possible to work out the values for W, X, Y and Z.

I'll let you do the calculations!!

Posted
Callipygous' date=' using your diagram above i have come up with four eqaution as follows:

 

40 + X + Y = 180

50 + W + Z = 180

70 + Y + Z = 180

20 + X + W = 180

 

using these four equations it should then be possible to work out the values for W, X, Y and Z.

I'll let you do the calculations!![/quote']

 

 

thats all well and good, except your working with the exact same relationships all the way around.

 

in normal systems that kind of thinking works great, but all the numbers are the same in this one (its always related to 180 the same way). the end result is that when you do normal system solving methods your variables cancel out and you end up with things like 140=140.

 

which is what i meant about the algebra going in cirlces.

Posted

ok, had to figure that one out the hard way!! took me half an hour of calculations to figure out that you were right.

 

here's an idea, this is just an idea though so it might be way off the mark.

The triangle that is enclosed by the two angles of 50 degrees and the corner of the main triangle is an isoleces (?!) triangle.

could some trigo be used here to get your 4 unknown angles?

just a thought.

Posted
not at all.

 

Ummmmm...

 

Ok,

Halfway between point A and point B there is another point.

 

please call it point D

 

and.

 

Halfway between point A and point C there is another point.

 

Please call it point E.

 

Please remove the LINE that goes from point D to point E.

 

Now throw your brain at it.

Posted

Correct,

Please do it anyway .

there is no penalty.

You can put it back later, after you have looked at the triangles in a new light.

Posted

ok... i dont understand what your getting at. when you remove that line you remove the only parts of the problem im still trying to figure out. maybe be a little more specific?

Posted

That's ok.

I'm not sure what I'm getting at either.

so with the line DE removed, can you now see only three overlapping triangles?

Posted

Yes!

 

The three big ones.

 

Can you use Pythagoras to work out the Two unknown angles?

I mean.

s=o/h

c=a/h

t=o/a

Posted

Yes do it that way,

why make life hard.

 

So now are you able to put those two angles and your removed DE line back on your diagram.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.