Edward Posted May 6, 2005 Posted May 6, 2005 How many can you think of (and name with properties). Anamantium (not spelled right) From X-Men A very shiny non mallibule non corrsive mettal that is virtually industrucitiable and once forged cannot be destroyed. Naquada From SG-1 Non radioactive highley reactive super heavy element looks like grafite. Naqaudria SG-1 same as naquada but more reactive and is more unstable. Maclarium SG-1 does not exist in nature atomic weight over 200 most likley non radioactive.
Insane Posted May 6, 2005 Posted May 6, 2005 How about that element from Spider-man 2? I forget the name, someone refresh my memory. It looked pretty damn cool though. Edit: Was it 'Tritium'? Isn't Tritium H3?
budullewraagh Posted May 6, 2005 Posted May 6, 2005 it's the isotope of hydrogen known as H3, yes. Anamantium=adamantium actually "Anamantium (not spelled right) From X-Men A very shiny non mallibule non corrsive mettal that is virtually industrucitiable and once forged cannot be destroyed. probably a transition metal related to osmium, iridium, tungsten Naquada From SG-1 Non radioactive highley reactive super heavy element looks like grafite. probably ununquadium Naqaudria SG-1 same as naquada but more reactive and is more unstable. probably below ununquadium Maclarium SG-1 does not exist in nature atomic weight over 200 most likley non radioactive. inconceivable based on the fact that it is not found in nature AND it's NOT radioactive"
Insane Posted May 6, 2005 Posted May 6, 2005 Oh yeah, What about the Bob Lazar guy who claimed Ununpentium could actually exist without decaying instantly.
H2SO4 Posted May 6, 2005 Posted May 6, 2005 Oh yeah, What about the Bob Lazar guy who claimed Ununpentium could actually exist without decaying instantly. Bob lazar is the owner of unitednuclear.com and does pyrotechnic shows in desert blast.
H2SO4 Posted May 6, 2005 Posted May 6, 2005 Its a crazy event were hardcore people go in nevada (i think) and shoot of fireworks and walk around naked and theres bikers. I havent read this whole site, but it should get an overview. Its probaly an incredible event. http://www.desertblast.org/
YT2095 Posted May 6, 2005 Posted May 6, 2005 BO0 (it`s just after Magnessium). apparently it`s the element of surprise
blackout Posted May 6, 2005 Posted May 6, 2005 my teacher has named one from his name, the Besnerium!
darth tater Posted May 6, 2005 Posted May 6, 2005 How about Kryptonite (sp?) from Superman? Is there really such an element?
Lance Posted May 6, 2005 Posted May 6, 2005 How about Kryptonite (sp?) from Superman? Is there really such an element? Thats a fictional compound but not element.
ydoaPs Posted May 6, 2005 Posted May 6, 2005 Krypton. some of these aren't elements, but fake compounds. like Kryptonite and Adamantium. edit: Lance, grrr...
H2SO4 Posted May 6, 2005 Posted May 6, 2005 I always thought of adamantium as an allow of several elements.
MulderMan Posted May 10, 2005 Posted May 10, 2005 dilithium, latinum and the rest of the star trek ones. theres a list here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fictional_elements
entropydave Posted May 10, 2005 Posted May 10, 2005 ...if any of these 'exotic' transuranic elements exist, then they would have been spotted in stellar spectra - even very short 1/2 life ones like Al26 have been detected, so if thre were any >115 atomic no. elements, I wuold have guessed they would have been found, albeit fleetingly! my 2 femtograms worth....
jdurg Posted May 10, 2005 Posted May 10, 2005 In order to get nuclei of that weight, you need to fuse very large atoms together. A star only produces atoms of any appreciable weight when it is collapsing into a supernova. So I am fairly confident that even in the far reaches of space, elements >115 don't exist.
Insane Posted May 11, 2005 Posted May 11, 2005 H2S04, google 'Bob Lazar' and you'll know what I mean.
soulestada Posted May 11, 2005 Posted May 11, 2005 Dihydrogen monoxide? Isn't that another name for water?
akcapr Posted May 11, 2005 Posted May 11, 2005 dueterium oxide is heavy water. i have no idea wat significance that has here
entropydave Posted May 11, 2005 Posted May 11, 2005 In order to get nuclei of that weight, you need to fuse very large atoms together. A star only produces atoms of any appreciable weight when it is collapsing into a supernova. So I am fairly confident that even in the far reaches of space, elements >115 don't exist. Yep, as a astrophysics student I concur. Even if they had short 1/2 lives, I suspect we'd detect the daughter nuclei?
jdurg Posted May 11, 2005 Posted May 11, 2005 But even the daughter nuclei have relatively short half-lives in the grand scheme of things.
Guest river-wind Posted May 11, 2005 Posted May 11, 2005 118 was seen, but then no one could see it again, so it may not have been seen at all. it's like religion with fast-moving particles. 116 has been seen in the lab, though: http://www.webelements.com/webelements/elements/text/Uuh/key.html
jdurg Posted May 11, 2005 Posted May 11, 2005 Yeah, the claim to have discovered element 118 has been retracted because the group that submitted the discovery realized that they misread their data. They were also unable to reproduce their results, so they have retracted all statements about the discovery.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now