Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Let's call a set "Pseudo compact" if it has the property that every closed cover (a cover consisting of closed sets) have a finite subcover.


Does "Pseudo Compact" in this case the same as "Anti-Compact" ? Then how can we describe the "Pseudo-Compact" subsets of Real Numbers?


Posted

Thank you for giving the definition of "pseudo-compact". Now, it would help if you would give the definition of "anti-compact'!

 

Added: I have found two definitions of "anti-compact":

1) a subset A in a topological space X is anti-compact if every covering of A by closed sets has a finite subcover.

 

2) anti-compact means that the only compact subsets of X are the finite ones.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

there ,I see something like equivalency between two part of analysis.

if all sequences have convergent subsequences at any (X) set X is said to be compact. (f.analysis)

 

The descriptions in real analysis seem like another descriptions. basic and or functional analysis. of course topology might contain more different ones.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.