Tom O'Neil Posted October 27, 2016 Author Posted October 27, 2016 all is energy and time is abstract.
Mordred Posted October 27, 2016 Posted October 27, 2016 all is energy and time is abstract. Thats a ridiculous statement. energy is merely one of many properties that a particle has. It isn't even considered a property of a particle as it cannot be used to identify one particle from another
Tom O'Neil Posted October 27, 2016 Author Posted October 27, 2016 energy is merely one of many properties that a particle has. It isn't even considered a property of a particle as it cannot be used to identify one particle from another That argument is an oxymoron. Also if all is not energy than Einstein is incorrect. -1
Mordred Posted October 27, 2016 Posted October 27, 2016 You can measure the momentum of a particle its wavelength determines its energy. A particle is identified by properties that all particles of the same type share. Things like spin, charge, flavor,color,parity, isopspin etc. Any particle can have different values of its energy, so its not identifiable to a specific value per particle type energy is merely one of many properties that a particle has. It isn't even considered a property of a particle as it cannot be used to identify one particle from another That argument is an oxymoron. Also if all is not energy than Einstein is incorrect. Einstein never claimed the formula e=mc^2 was a unification formula, thats your misconception 1
Tom O'Neil Posted October 27, 2016 Author Posted October 27, 2016 But when you combine his equation with proportionality to GT you get a GUT. -1
Mordred Posted October 27, 2016 Posted October 27, 2016 But when you combine his equation with proportionality to GT you get a GUT. Wrong. Maybe you should actually learn what a GUT means instead of spouting utter nonsense. GUT theories http://arxiv.org/pdf/0904.1556.pdf The Algebra of Grand Unified Theories John Baez and John Huerta http://pdg.lbl.gov/2011/reviews/rpp2011-rev-guts.pdf GRAND UNIFIED THEORIES Or better yet actually understand whats involved in particle physics. Particle Physics http://arxiv.org/abs/0810.3328 A Simple Introduction to Particle Physics http://arxiv.org/abs/0908.1395 part 2 part 2 covers relativity
Tom O'Neil Posted October 27, 2016 Author Posted October 27, 2016 Thankyou Mordred I will look them over 2
Mordred Posted October 27, 2016 Posted October 27, 2016 (edited) no prob, unfortunately the two particle physics articles is literally the simplist I can find outside of textbooks. A good textbook is "Quarks and Leptons" though Griffith's Introduction to Particle Physics is also good. can you show me a link where the gravitational constant is used in e=mc^2? see section 6.4.1 of part 2 Simple particle physics liink, particular equations 6.4.16 to 6.4.19. Read up till 6.4.4 You will note those particular equations denote the principle of equivalence. You can easily find solutions on how f=ma correlates to the full version of e=mc^2. (energy/momentum formula) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy%E2%80%93momentum_relation I'd have to check but those last two articles most likely show that. If not I can easily show the solution. Edited October 27, 2016 by Mordred
Strange Posted October 27, 2016 Posted October 27, 2016 Prove to me that the equation is not proportional. It fails dimensional analysis. Done.
Klaynos Posted October 27, 2016 Posted October 27, 2016 It fails dimensional analysis. Done. ! Moderator Note This and a lack of a clear derivation wedged requested makes this not meet our minimum requirements for speculations so thread closed. You may not reintroduce this topic. You may request this thread reopened when you can provide a mathematical derivation of your equation. To do so please report this post. 1
Recommended Posts